Literature DB >> 8976992

Mechanisms specialized for the perception of image geometry.

D W Heeley1, H M Buchanan-Smith.   

Abstract

Angle discrimination thresholds were obtained for V-shaped targets with a base angle of 90 deg at four different pattern orientations (0, 45, 90 and 135 deg). A comparison of these thresholds with the orientation discrimination thresholds for the single lines from which the patterns had been constructed, revealed that angle acuity cannot be predicted from component acuity. Angle acuity is finer than the corresponding orientation acuity in all cases and does not exhibit the pronounced oblique effect that is found for orientation discrimination. Other experiments showed that acuity for pattern angle depends critically on base angle, with minima close to 0, 90 and 180 deg. The shape and amplitude of this function are independent of pattern orientation. It was found that the angle acuity was unaffected by excluding a large portion of the target in the region of the vertex, and that the pattern of dependence of acuity on angle changed radically when the target was reduced ultimately to three blobs that defined the cardinal points of the stimulus. The data suggest that when the target comprises line segments, angle discrimination is not limited by noise that arises at early levels of processing and that angle perception is mediated by mechanisms that are specialized for the perception of image geometry. An opponent process model, that is based on the combined outputs of just two types of filter, is proposed as the basis for the perception of image geometry. This type of system is appropriate for computing one of the differential invariants in an optic flow field.

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8976992     DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(96)00077-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  6 in total

1.  Effects of distractors on the perception of right angles.

Authors:  A Bulatov; A Bertulis; A Bieliavicius; E Loginovic
Journal:  Neurosci Behav Physiol       Date:  2010-06-08

2.  Distortions in length perception: visual field anisotropy and geometrical illusions.

Authors:  A Bertulis; A Bulatov
Journal:  Neurosci Behav Physiol       Date:  2005-05

3.  Influence of parallel and orthogonal real lines on illusory contour perception.

Authors:  Barbara Dillenburger; Anna W Roe
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-10-28       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Selective mechanisms for simple contours revealed by compound adaptation.

Authors:  Sarah Hancock; Jonathan W Peirce
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2008-06-03       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  The statistical shape of geometric reasoning.

Authors:  Yuval Hart; Moira R Dillon; Andrew Marantan; Anna L Cardenas; Elizabeth Spelke; L Mahadevan
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-08-27       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  rTMS of the superior parietal lobule improves contrast discrimination but has no effect on the perception of distance between stimuli in the image plane.

Authors:  Nicolo Biagi; Charlotte Goodwin; David T Field
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2022-08-15       Impact factor: 1.695

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.