Literature DB >> 8976628

Keyboard reaction force and finger flexor electromyograms during computer keyboard work.

B J Martin1, T J Armstrong, J A Foulke, S Natarajan, E Klinenberg, E Serina, D Rempel.   

Abstract

This study examines the relationship between forearm EMGs and keyboard reaction forces in 10 people during keyboard tasks performed at a comfortable speed. A linear fit of EMG force data for each person and finger was calculated during static fingertip loading. An average r2 of .71 was observed for forces below 50% of the maximal voluntary contraction (MVC). These regressions were used to characterize EMG data in force units during the typing task. Averaged peak reaction forces measured during typing ranged from 3.33 N (thumb) to 1.84 N (little finger), with an overall average of 2.54 N, which represents about 10% MVC and 5.4 times the key switch make force (0.47 N). Individual peak or mean finger forces obtained from EMG were greater (1.2 to 3.2 times) than force measurements; hence the range of r2 for EMG force was .10 to .46. A closer correspondence between EMG and peak force was obtained using EMG averaged across all fingers. For 5 of the participants the force computed from EMG was within +/-20% of the reaction force. For the other 5 participants forces were overestimated. For 9 participants the difference between EMG estimated force and the reaction force was less than 13% MVC. It is suggested that the difference between EMG and finger force partly results from the amount of muscle load not captured by the measured applied force.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8976628     DOI: 10.1518/001872096778827288

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Factors        ISSN: 0018-7208            Impact factor:   2.888


  9 in total

1.  In vivo finger flexor tendon force while tapping on a keyswitch.

Authors:  J T Dennerlein; E Diao; C D Mote; D M Rempel
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 3.494

2.  Perceptual constancy and the perceived magnitude of muscle forces.

Authors:  Lynette A Jones
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-05-27       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 3.  The impact of a computerized work environment on professional occupational groups and behavioural and physiological risk factors for musculoskeletal symptoms: a literature review.

Authors:  Karin Lindgren Griffiths; Martin G Mackey; Barbara J Adamson
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2007-12

4.  Behavioral and psychophysiological responses to job demands and association with musculoskeletal symptoms in computer work.

Authors:  Karin Lindgren Griffiths; Martin G Mackey; Barbara J Adamson
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2011-12

5.  Fatigue development in the finger flexor muscle differs between keyboard and mouse use.

Authors:  Jeong Ho Kim; Peter W Johnson
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2014-08-09       Impact factor: 3.078

6.  Discriminating between individuals with and without musculoskeletal disorders of the upper extremity by means of items related to computer keyboard use.

Authors:  Nancy A Baker; Nancy B Sussman; Mark S Redfern
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2008-04-08

7.  The effect of therapeutic instrumental music performance method on upper extremity functions in adolescent cerebral palsy.

Authors:  Bilinc Dogruoz Karatekin; Afitap Icagasioglu
Journal:  Acta Neurol Belg       Date:  2021-02-15       Impact factor: 2.396

8.  Finger exercise with keyboard playing in adults with cerebral palsy: A preliminary study.

Authors:  Hyun Ju Chong; Sung-Rae Cho; Eunju Jeong; Soo Ji Kim
Journal:  J Exerc Rehabil       Date:  2013-08-31

9.  Age Modulates the Effects of Mental Fatigue on Typewriting.

Authors:  Marlon de Jong; Jacob Jolij; André Pimenta; Monicque M Lorist
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-07-05
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.