Literature DB >> 8976622

Users as designers: how people cope with poor HCI design in computer-based medical devices.

J H Obradovich1, D D Woods.   

Abstract

In this paper we examine how users interact with a computer-based infusion device adapted for terbutaline infusion to treat preterm labor in women experiencing high-risk pregnancies. This study examines (a) the human-computer interaction (HCI) deficiencies in the device as related to this context of use, (b) how the device characteristics increase the potential for error, and (c) the tailoring strategies developed by users to insulate themselves from failure. Interviews with nurses and tests of the behavior of the infusion device in different conditions identified several classic HCI deficiencies: complex and arbitrary sequences of operation, mode errors caused by poor differentiation of multiple operating modes intended for different contexts, ambiguous alarms, getting lost in multiple displays, and poor feedback on device state and behavior.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8976622     DOI: 10.1518/001872096778827251

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Factors        ISSN: 0018-7208            Impact factor:   2.888


  8 in total

1.  Arguing for the need of triangulation and iteration when designing medical equipment.

Authors:  Karin Garmer; Erik Liljegren; Anna-Lisa Osvalder; Sven Dahlman
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 2.502

2.  Multiple Intravenous Infusions Phase 2b: Laboratory Study.

Authors:  Sonia Pinkney; Mark Fan; Katherine Chan; Christine Koczmara; Christopher Colvin; Farzan Sasangohar; Caterina Masino; Anthony Easty; Patricia Trbovich
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2014-05-01

3.  How usability of a web-based clinical decision support system has the potential to contribute to adverse medical events.

Authors:  Timothy A D Graham; Andre W Kushniruk; Michael J Bullard; Brian R Holroyd; David P Meurer; Brian H Rowe
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2008-11-06

4.  Evaluation of the user-friendliness of seven new generation intensive care ventilators.

Authors:  Laurence Vignaux; Didier Tassaux; Philippe Jolliet
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2009-07-29       Impact factor: 17.440

5.  Can prospective usability evaluation predict data errors?

Authors:  Constance M Johnson; Meredith Nahm; Ryan J Shaw; Ashley Dunham; Kristin Newby; Rowena Dolor; Michelle Smerek; Guilherme Del Fiol; Jiajie Zhang
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2010-11-13

6.  A usability evaluation of four commercial dental computer-based patient record systems.

Authors:  Thankam P Thyvalikakath; Valerie Monaco; Hima Bindu Thambuganipalle; Titus Schleyer
Journal:  J Am Dent Assoc       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 3.634

7.  Causes of intravenous medication errors: an ethnographic study.

Authors:  K Taxis; N Barber
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2003-10

Review 8.  Nurses' workarounds in acute healthcare settings: a scoping review.

Authors:  Deborah S Debono; David Greenfield; Joanne F Travaglia; Janet C Long; Deborah Black; Julie Johnson; Jeffrey Braithwaite
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2013-05-11       Impact factor: 2.655

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.