Literature DB >> 8976264

Wide excision (nonnerve sparing) radical retropubic prostatectomy using an initial perirectal dissection.

R A Stephenson1, R G Middleton, T M Abbott.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Positive surgical margin rates after radical retropubic prostatectomy are reported to range from 25 to 50% in contemporary series. We report on 53 nonnerve sparing radical retropubic prostatectomies performed with attention paid to extending the margin of attached periprostatic tissue. This was accomplished primarily by initial perirectal release of periprostatic tissues at the level of longitudinal rectal fibers posterior and lateral to the prostate. This perirectal release ensures that maximal quantities of periprostatic tissue will remain with the prostate specimen and will not be attenuated or sheared away at subsequent stages of the procedure.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Pathological material was examined for capsular penetration and surgical margins using transverse whole mount sections of the prostate at 4 to 5 mm. intervals. Patients were followed at regular intervals with physical examinations and serum prostate specific antigen (PSA) determinations.
RESULTS: The series consisted of 6, 5, 14 and 28 cases of clinical stages T1b, T1c, T2a and T2b cancer, respectively. Mean PSA was 10.0 ng./ml. and mean Gleason score was 5.9. Capsular penetration was observed in 47 of 53 cases (89%) and positive surgical margins were noted in 7 (13%). With a median followup of 3.61 years 2 patients experienced PSA defined recurrence.
CONCLUSIONS: We believe that positive surgical margin rates may be decreased when technical modifications are directed at increasing the amount of periprostatic tissue excised with the surgical specimen.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 8976264

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  5 in total

Review 1.  Surgery for locally advanced disease.

Authors:  Philippe E Spiess; Dan Leibovici; Louis L Pisters
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 3.092

2.  Important preoperative prognostic factors for extracapsular extension, seminal vesicle invasion and lymph node involvement in cases with radical retropubic prostatectomy.

Authors:  A Ozgür; F F Onol; L N Türkeri
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 2.370

Review 3.  [Node-positive prostate cancer. Value of radical prostatectomy].

Authors:  A Heidenreich; A J Schrader
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 0.639

4.  Randomized trial comparing an anterograde versus a retrograde approach to open radical prostatectomy: results in terms of positive margin rate.

Authors:  Alessandro Sciarra; Cristiano Cristini; Magnus Von Heland; Stefano Salciccia; Vincenzo Gentile
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 1.862

5.  Impact of capsular incision on biochemical recurrence after radical perineal prostatectomy.

Authors:  K W Kwak; H M Lee; H Y Choi
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2009-06-02       Impact factor: 5.554

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.