Literature DB >> 8974725

Practice guidelines for the treatment of osteoporosis.

R L Prince1.   

Abstract

History will probably describe this as a significant era for osteoporosis management, which has recently shifted from the laboratory and research clinic into mainstream clinical practice. It is timely, therefore, to provide practice guidelines for clinical use in this area; they must be developed carefully, however, so as to ensure that they are generated from reliable data. Furthermore, in current circumstances, management not only must be effective but also must aim for cost minimization; this is a difficult area in which little information is available. Also, in light of increased knowledge about skeletal medicine, complex cases should be considered for referral to an expert. The diagnosis of osteoporosis centers on two main steps: the identification of patients at risk and the estimation of bone density at two skeletal sites to help in ascertaining future fracture risk. At present, the main question in this approach centers on identifying the risk level threshold at which bone density should be evaluated. Although it is generally agreed that anyone with an atraumatic osteoporotic fracture will benefit from bone density estimation, the exact risk level for other, less easily defined indicators (e.g., cigarette smoking) is unclear. Once the diagnosis of osteoporosis is made, the cause must be elucidated by appropriate biochemical and imaging techniques. Appropriate therapy varies with the cause and level of risk. Although many treatments are currently available, including pharmacologic intervention, dietary changes, and exercise, they must be selected and adapted according to the needs of the individual patient, a process requiring both skill and patience.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8974725     DOI: 10.1007/s002239900171

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int        ISSN: 0171-967X            Impact factor:   4.333


  20 in total

1.  Risk factors for falls as a cause of hip fracture in women. The Northeast Hip Fracture Study Group.

Authors:  J A Grisso; J L Kelsey; B L Strom; G Y Chiu; G Maislin; L A O'Brien; S Hoffman; F Kaplan
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1991-05-09       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 2.  Calcium absorption efficiency and calcium requirements in children and adolescents.

Authors:  M Peacock
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 7.045

Review 3.  Consensus development conference: diagnosis, prophylaxis, and treatment of osteoporosis.

Authors: 
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 4.965

4.  Pre-existing fractures and bone mass predict vertebral fracture incidence in women.

Authors:  P D Ross; J W Davis; R S Epstein; R D Wasnich
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1991-06-01       Impact factor: 25.391

5.  Predicting vertebral fracture incidence from prevalent fractures and bone density among non-black, osteoporotic women.

Authors:  P D Ross; H K Genant; J W Davis; P D Miller; R D Wasnich
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Bone density at various sites for prediction of hip fractures. The Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group.

Authors:  S R Cummings; D M Black; M C Nevitt; W Browner; J Cauley; K Ensrud; H K Genant; L Palermo; J Scott; T M Vogt
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1993-01-09       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Symptomatic fracture incidence in elderly men and women: the Dubbo Osteoporosis Epidemiology Study (DOES).

Authors:  G Jones; T Nguyen; P N Sambrook; P J Kelly; C Gilbert; J A Eisman
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  Baseline measurement of bone mass predicts fracture in white women.

Authors:  S L Hui; C W Slemenda; C C Johnston
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1989-09-01       Impact factor: 25.391

9.  Comparison of new biochemical markers of bone turnover in late postmenopausal osteoporotic women in response to alendronate treatment.

Authors:  P Garnero; W J Shih; E Gineyts; D B Karpf; P D Delmas
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 5.958

10.  A multifactorial intervention to reduce the risk of falling among elderly people living in the community.

Authors:  M E Tinetti; D I Baker; G McAvay; E B Claus; P Garrett; M Gottschalk; M L Koch; K Trainor; R I Horwitz
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1994-09-29       Impact factor: 91.245

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.