Literature DB >> 8973924

Lay American conceptions of nutrition: dose insensitivity, categorical thinking, contagion, and the monotonic mind.

P Rozin1, M Ashmore, M Markwith.   

Abstract

Two studies explored Americans' tendency to simplify nutrition information. Substantial minorities of separate samples of college students, physical plant workers, and a national sample considered a variety of substances, including some essential nutrients (salt and fat), to be harmful at trace levels. Almost half the respondents believed that high-calorie foods in small amounts contain more calories than low-calorie foods in much larger amounts. Many subjects classified foods according to a good/bad dichotomy, and almost all subjects confounded nutritional completeness with long-term healthfulness of foods. To account for these results, we suggest the following heuristics and biases: dose insensitivity, categorical perception, a "monotonic mind" belief (if something is harmful at high levels then it is harmful at low levels), and the magical principle of contagion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8973924     DOI: 10.1037//0278-6133.15.6.438

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Psychol        ISSN: 0278-6133            Impact factor:   4.267


  8 in total

1.  Cereal Deal: How the Physical Appearance of Others Affects Attention to Healthy Foods.

Authors:  Tobias Otterbring; Kerstin Gidlöf; Kristian Rolschau; Poja Shams
Journal:  Perspect Behav Sci       Date:  2020-02-19

2.  What Is Nutritious Snack Food? A Comparison of Expert and Layperson Assessments.

Authors:  Tamara Bucher; Christina Hartmann; Megan E Rollo; Clare E Collins
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2017-08-14       Impact factor: 5.717

3.  Origins in the USA in the 1980s of the warning that smokeless tobacco is not a safe alternative to cigarettes: a historical, documents-based assessment with implications for comparative warnings on less harmful tobacco/nicotine products.

Authors:  Lynn T Kozlowski
Journal:  Harm Reduct J       Date:  2018-04-16

4.  Visual perceptions of portion size normality and intended food consumption: A norm range model.

Authors:  Ashleigh Haynes; Charlotte A Hardman; Alexis D J Makin; Jason C G Halford; Susan A Jebb; Eric Robinson
Journal:  Food Qual Prefer       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 5.565

5.  Relative Risk Perceptions between Snus and Cigarettes in a Snus-Prevalent Society-An Observational Study over a 16 Year Period.

Authors:  Karl Erik Lund; Tord Finne Vedoy
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-03-11       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  Experiencing social connection: A qualitative study of mothers of nonspeaking autistic children.

Authors:  Vikram K Jaswal; Janette Dinishak; Christine Stephan; Nameera Akhtar
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-11-25       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  Does food marketing need to make us fat? A review and solutions.

Authors:  Pierre Chandon; Brian Wansink
Journal:  Nutr Rev       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 6.846

8.  Underestimating calorie content when healthy foods are present: an averaging effect or a reference-dependent anchoring effect?

Authors:  Suzanna E Forwood; Amy Ahern; Gareth J Hollands; Paul C Fletcher; Theresa M Marteau
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-08-14       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.