Literature DB >> 8972974

Anxiety and depression in hospitalized patients with cancer: agreement in patient-staff dyads.

C Lampic1, L von Essen, V W Peterson, G Larsson, P O Sjödén.   

Abstract

Patient and staff perceptions of patient anxiety and depression were determined in 53 dyads of hospitalized cancer patients and their nursing staff. Patient anxiety and depression were assessed with the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. In addition, anxiety was measured by a numerical (0-10) scale. A staff person who had been caring for a certain patient the previous 3 days assessed that patient's anxiety and depression with staff versions of the same instruments. For one subsample (n = 18), staff were also asked to estimate their own hypothetical anxiety were they to have the same disease as the patient. Results indicate that staff overestimated patient anxiety systematically and showed limited ability to adequately assess patient anxiety and depression in terms of rank. Patients and staff agreed about individual patients' levels of anxiety and depression only to a limited degree. Discrepancies between patient and staff ratings of patient anxiety predominantly concerned patients reporting low anxiety levels. Several explanations for these findings are discussed. One possible explanation, the "requirement of mourning" hypothesis, is supported by our findings that staff estimation of patient anxiety was strongly associated with their estimation of their own hypothetical anxiety if they were to be in the patient's situation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8972974     DOI: 10.1097/00002820-199612000-00002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Nurs        ISSN: 0162-220X            Impact factor:   2.592


  8 in total

Review 1.  Quality-of-life assessment tools for men with prostate cancer.

Authors:  Jonathan Bergman; Aaron Laviana
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2014-05-20       Impact factor: 14.432

2.  Pain and anxiety during bone marrow aspiration/biopsy: Comparison of ratings among patients versus health-care professionals.

Authors:  Y Lidén; N Olofsson; O Landgren; E Johansson
Journal:  Eur J Oncol Nurs       Date:  2012-02-16       Impact factor: 2.398

3.  Quality of life in men undergoing active surveillance for localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Jonathan Bergman; Mark S Litwin
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  2012-12

4.  Ways of understanding the encounter with head and neck cancer patients in the hospital dental team--a phenomenographic study.

Authors:  Marta Röing; J-M Hirsch; Inger Holmström
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2006-03-24       Impact factor: 3.603

5.  Psychiatric Profile of Retinal Detachment Surgery under Regional Block.

Authors:  Emad Abboud; Afaf Mansour; Waleed Riad
Journal:  Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-01

6.  A Comparison of the Renal Cell Carcinoma-Symptom Index (RCC-SI) and the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Kidney Symptom Index (FKSI).

Authors:  Deepa Rao; Zeeshan Butt; Sarah Rosenbloom; Don Robinson; Jamie Von Roenn; Timothy M Kuzel; David Cella
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2009-04-08       Impact factor: 3.612

7.  Comparing two types of perspective taking as strategies for detecting distress amongst parents of children with cancer: A randomised trial.

Authors:  Lucie Gouveia; Annie Janvier; France Dupuis; Michel Duval; Serge Sultan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-04-06       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  The psychosocial needs of underserved breast cancer survivors and perspectives of their clinicians and support providers.

Authors:  Kristen J Wells; Julia H Drizin; Amy E Ustjanauskas; Coralia Vázquez-Otero; Tonya M Pan-Weisz; Danielle Ung; Claudia Carrizosa; Christine Laronga; Richard G Roetzheim; Kenneth Johnson; Marilyn Norton; Rosa Cobian Aguilar; Gwendolyn P Quinn
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2021-07-07       Impact factor: 3.603

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.