Literature DB >> 8972563

Comparison of the content and subpopulations of CD3 and CD34 positive cells in bone marrow harvests and G-CSF-mobilized peripheral blood leukapheresis products from healthy adult donors.

H T Hassan1, M Stockschläder, B Schleimer, W Krüger, A R Zander.   

Abstract

Recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF)-mobilized peripheral blood stem/progenitor cells (PBPC) have replaced bone marrow (BM) harvests for autologous transplantation after myeloablative therapy in cancer patients. G-CSF-mobilized PBPC from healthy donors contain one log excess of T lymphocytes representing a potential risk for graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). However, recent pilot clinical studies of G-CSF-mobilized allogeneic PBPC transplantation have shown rapid haematological recovery and no severe acute GVHD except in a very few cases. Therefore, the risk of inducing severe acute GVHD is not as high as was expected during the pioneering period of allogeneic PBPC transplantation. The present study was performed to address the possible reasons for the rapid haematological recovery and the absence of severe acute GVHD observed after allogeneic PBPC transplantation by comparing the contents and subsets of CD3+ and CD34+ G-CSF-mobilized PBPC (n = 31) with those of BM (n = 26) allografts from healthy adult donors. The present results revealed that the phenotypic profiles of CD3+ and CD34+ cells differ between PBPC and BM allografts. The single PBPC leukapheresis product contained 10 times more mononuclear cells, 1.5 times more CD34+ cells, 5.5 times more CD3+ T lymphocytes, 3 times more CD19+ B lymphocytes and 3.8 times more CD14+ monocytes than the single BM harvest. Both CD34+CD33+ myeloid progenitor cells and CD34+HLA-DR-long-term reconstituting haemopoietic stem cells were significantly increased in the CD34+ G-CSF-mobilized PBPC compared with the CD34+ BM cells; median 73.1% and 30.4% vs 60.6% and 5.0%, respectively, P < 0.01. The percentage of CD3+ cells coexpressing CD4 (T helper/inducer) was similar in both PBPC and BM allografts, 47.2% and 45.6%, respectively, whereas the percentage of CD3+ cells coexpressing CD8 (T suppressor/cytotoxic) was significantly decreased in PBPC compared with BM; 37.0% vs 55.9%, p < 0.01. The rapid haematological recovery after allogeneic PBPC transplantation could be due to the increased content of CD34+CD33+ myeloid committed cells and the CD34+HLA-DR-long-term reconstituting haemopoietic stem cells in the PBPC allografts. Also, the absence of an increased risk of severe acute GVHD after allogeneic PBPC transplantation could be due to the increased T lymphocyte ratio of CD4+/CD8+ in the PBPC allografts. In conclusion, rapid haematological recovery without an increased risk of severe acute GVHD can be achieved using G-CSF-mobilized PBPC rather than BM for allogeneic transplantation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8972563     DOI: 10.1016/s0966-3274(96)80054-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transpl Immunol        ISSN: 0966-3274            Impact factor:   1.708


  5 in total

1.  Beyond bone marrow: a new source of stem cells.

Authors:  C I Chen; A Keating
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2001-03-06       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Peripheral blood hematopoietic stem cells for transplantation of hematological diseases from related, haploidentical donors after reduced-intensity conditioning.

Authors:  Kavita Raj; Antonio Pagliuca; Kenneth Bradstock; Victor Noriega; Victoria Potter; Matthew Streetly; Donal McLornan; Majid Kazmi; Judith Marsh; John Kwan; Gillian Huang; Lisa Getzendaner; Stephanie Lee; Katherine A Guthrie; Ghulam J Mufti; Paul O'Donnell
Journal:  Biol Blood Marrow Transplant       Date:  2014-03-18       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 3.  Prevention of relapse after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation by donor and cell source selection.

Authors:  Katharina Fleischhauer; Katharine C Hsu; Bronwen E Shaw
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2018-05-24       Impact factor: 5.483

Review 4.  G-CSF-primed bone marrow as a source of stem cells for allografting: revisiting the concept.

Authors:  U Deotare; G Al-Dawsari; S Couban; J H Lipton
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2015-04-27       Impact factor: 5.483

5.  Graft-versus-Host Disease after HLA-Matched Sibling Bone Marrow or Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation: Comparison of North American Caucasian and Japanese Populations.

Authors:  Junya Kanda; Ruta Brazauskas; Zhen-Huan Hu; Yachiyo Kuwatsuka; Koji Nagafuji; Heiwa Kanamori; Yoshinobu Kanda; Koichi Miyamura; Makoto Murata; Takahiro Fukuda; Hisashi Sakamaki; Fumihiko Kimura; Sachiko Seo; Mahmoud Aljurf; Ayami Yoshimi; Giuseppe Milone; William A Wood; Celalettin Ustun; Shahrukh Hashimi; Marcelo Pasquini; Carmem Bonfim; Jignesh Dalal; Theresa Hahn; Yoshiko Atsuta; Wael Saber
Journal:  Biol Blood Marrow Transplant       Date:  2016-01-04       Impact factor: 5.742

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.