Literature DB >> 8972502

Mechanisms of action of intrauterine devices.

M E Ortiz1, H B Croxatto, C W Bardin.   

Abstract

The major effect of all intrauterine devices (IUD) is to induce a local inflammatory reaction in the endometrium whose cellular and humoral components are released into the uterine cavity. This inflammatory reaction has a variable effect on the reproductive strategy of the species studied. For example, this foreign body reaction can be localized within the uterus of rodents; and in farm animals it can have striking extrauterine effects. Thus, the action of IUDs in humans cannot be discerned from animals. In humans, copper ions released from Cu-IUDs enhance the inflammatory response and reach concentrations in the luminal fluids of the genital tract that are toxic for spermatozoa and embryos. In women using the IUD, the entire genital tract seems affected, at least in part, because of luminal transmission of the fluids that accumulates in the uterine lumen. This affects the function or viability of gametes, decreasing the rate of fertilization and lowering the chances of survival of any embryo that may be formed, even before it reaches the uterus. Studies on the recovery of eggs from women using IUDs and from women not using contraception show that embryos are formed in the tubes of IUD users at a much lower rate compared with nonusers. This is believed to be the major action of IUDs. Therefore, the common belief that the major mechanism of action of IUDs in women is through destruction of embryos in the uterus (i.e., abortion) is not supported by the available evidence. In Cu-IUD users, it is likely that few spermatozoa reach the distal segment of the fallopian tube, those that encounter an egg may be in poor condition. Thus, the few eggs that are fertilized have little chance for development and their possibility for survival in the altered tubal milieu become worse as they approach the uterine cavity.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biology; Contraception; Contraceptive Methods--pharmacodynamics; Contraceptive Mode Of Action; Endometrial Effects; Endometrium; Family Planning; Genitalia; Genitalia, Female; Germ Cells; Implantation Suppression; Inhibition Of Fertilization; Iud--pharmacodynamics; Literature Review; Physiology; Spermatozoa; Urogenital System; Uterus

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8972502     DOI: 10.1097/00006254-199612000-00014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Surv        ISSN: 0029-7828            Impact factor:   2.347


  11 in total

1.  Knowledge and Training of Intrauterine Devices Among Primary Care Residents: Implications for Graduate Medical Education.

Authors:  Aparna Sridhar; Elizabeth Ruppel Forbes; Kelly Mooney; Radhika Rible
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2015-03

2.  Preventing pregnancy: a fresh look at the IUD.

Authors:  Erica Weir
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2003-09-16       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  Enhanced endocytotic and transcytotic activity in the rat endometrium prior to embryo implantation.

Authors:  C E Quinn; C Folkard; J Detmar; R F Casper
Journal:  J Mol Histol       Date:  2008-06-29       Impact factor: 2.611

Review 4.  Biomaterials and Contraception: Promises and Pitfalls.

Authors:  Isabella Claure; Deborah Anderson; Catherine M Klapperich; Wendy Kuohung; Joyce Y Wong
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2019-11-07       Impact factor: 3.934

5.  Intrauterine administration of CDB-2914 (Ulipristal) suppresses the endometrium of rhesus macaques.

Authors:  Robert M Brenner; Ov D Slayden; Anita Nath; Y Y Tsong; Regine Sitruk-Ware
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2009-12-16       Impact factor: 3.375

6.  The Effect of Contraception on Genital Cytokines in Women Randomized to Copper Intrauterine Device, Depot Medroxyprogesterone Acetate, or Levonorgestrel Implant.

Authors:  Ramla F Tanko; Rubina Bunjun; Smritee Dabee; Shameem Z Jaumdally; Maricianah Onono; Gonasagrie Nair; Thesla Palanee-Phillips; Rushil Harryparsad; Anna Ursula Happel; Hoyam Gamieldien; Yamkela Qumbelo; Musalula Sinkala; Caitlin W Scoville; Kate Heller; Jared M Baeten; Steven E Bosinger; Adam Burgener; Renee Heffron; Heather B Jaspan; Jo Ann S Passmore
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  2022-09-13       Impact factor: 7.759

7.  The effect of copper intrauterine devices on the expression of mucin 1 and integrin β1 in the luteal phase endometrium.

Authors:  Eray Calışkan; Yiğit Cakıroğlu; Ebru Coşkun; Banu Kumbak; Bahar Müezzinoğlu; Aydın Corakçı
Journal:  J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc       Date:  2009-12-01

Review 8.  Antiprogestin-releasing intrauterine devices: a novel approach to endometrial contraception.

Authors:  Nihar R Nayak; Ov D Slayden; Kunie Mah; Kristof Chwalisz; Robert M Brenner
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2007-03-21       Impact factor: 3.375

9.  An unusual case of recurrent urinary tract infection.

Authors:  N Kulshrestha; D Srivastava; T Ghatak; M S Yadav; S Samanta
Journal:  Indian J Nephrol       Date:  2015 Nov-Dec

10.  Safety, efficacy and patient acceptability of the contraceptive and non-contraceptive uses of the LNG-IUS.

Authors:  Paula H Bednarek; Jeffrey T Jensen
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2010-08-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.