Literature DB >> 8972407

Is the 50-gram glucose screening test ever diagnostic?

R A Bobrowski1, S F Bottoms, J A Micallef, M P Dombrowski.   

Abstract

The standard criteria for the diagnosis of gestational diabetes (GDM) is based on two abnormal values of a 3-h-100-g oral glucose tolerance test (GTT). Although a markedly elevated 1 h-50-g screen value has been suggested to support a diagnosis of GDM, limited data are available to substantiate this empiric observation. Our purpose was to examine the utility of various 50-g screen cutoff values in establishing the diagnosis of gestational diabetes. We identified 422 gravidas with a positive 50-g screen (> or = 135 mg/dl) who underwent additional glucose testing. GDM was defined according to the National Diabetes Data Group (NDDG) standards for the 3-h GTT. An analysis employing the criteria of Carpenter and Coustan was performed for comparison. If a patient had an elevated 50-g value and no 3-h GTT was performed, a fasting serum glucose > or = 140 mg/ dl was considered evidence of gestational diabetes. One hundred twenty four (29.4%) had GDM as defined by the NDDG criteria; this increased to 161 (38%) when the diagnosis was based on Carpenter and Coustan's criteria. The mean (+/- SD) gestational age at screening was 24 +/- 7 weeks. As expected, the prevalence of GDM increased in relation to an increasing 50-g value. All subjects with a 50-g screen > 216 mg/dl had evidence of gestational diabetes and required insulin for glycemic control. Patients with a 50-g screen > or = 220 mg/dl do not all require a 3-h GTT. Those with a fasting serum glucose of > or = 140 mg/dl may begin diet therapy, glucose monitoring, and insulin as indicated. If the fasting serum glucose is < 140 mg/dl, a 3-h GTT should be performed for confirmation of GDM. This approach will facilitate rapid therapeutic intervention and reduce the cost of care in this subset of patients. Gravidas with a very high 50-g screen are at significant risk of requiring insulin to maintain euglycemia during pregnancy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8972407     DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1520-6661(199611/12)5:6<317::AID-MFM5>3.0.CO;2-S

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Matern Fetal Med        ISSN: 1057-0802


  10 in total

1.  Diagnosis of gestational diabetes: Are five rounds of blood sampling necessary?

Authors:  Hyun-Hwa Cha; Won Ki Lee; Sujeong Kim; Hyun Mi Kim; Mi Ju Kim; Won Joon Seong
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2022-03-11       Impact factor: 1.817

2.  Predictive Characteristics of Elevated 1-Hour Glucose Challenge Test Results for Gestational Diabetes.

Authors:  Alan T N Tita; Yinglei Lai; Mark B Landon; Susan M Ramin; Brian Casey; Ronald J Wapner; Michael W Varner; John M Thorp; Anthony Sciscione; Patrick Catalano; Margaret Harper; George R Saade; Steve N Caritis; Yoram Sorokin; Alan M Peaceman; Jorge E Tolosa
Journal:  Am J Perinatol       Date:  2017-07-19       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 3.  The utility of a single test to identify women at risk for gestational diabetes.

Authors:  D A Sacks
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 4.810

4.  Markedly different rates of incident insulin treatment based on universal gestational diabetes mellitus screening in a diverse HMO population.

Authors:  Teresa A Hillier; Keith K Ogasawara; Kathryn L Pedula; Kimberly K Vesco
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2013-06-28       Impact factor: 8.661

5.  Gestational diabetes mellitus: Get, set, go From diabetes capital of the world to diabetes care capital of the world.

Authors:  Navneet Magon
Journal:  Indian J Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2011-07

6.  The relationship between markedly elevated glucose challenge test results and the rate of gestational diabetes mellitus and gestational impaired glucose tolerance.

Authors:  Deniz Karcaaltincaba; Sadiman Altinbas; Mesut Akyol; Tugba Ensari; Serdar Yalvac
Journal:  Ann Saudi Med       Date:  2012 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.526

7.  The trends and risk factors to predict adverse outcomes in gestational diabetes mellitus: a 10-year experience from 2006 to 2015 in a single tertiary center.

Authors:  Minji Kim; Juyoung Park; Soo Hyun Kim; Yoo Min Kim; Cheonga Yee; Suk-Joo Choi; Soo-Young Oh; Cheong-Rae Roh
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Sci       Date:  2018-04-17

8.  Effect of lactation on the recurrence rate of gestational diabetes mellitus: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Sivan Zuarez-Easton; Ilanit Berkovich; Daphna Birenbaum-Carmeli; Alon Tal; Raja Zoabi; Raed Salim
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2020-03-18       Impact factor: 2.344

9.  How high is too high in cutoff levels from 50-g glucose challenge test.

Authors:  Hyun-Hwa Cha; Ji Ye Kim; Suk-Joo Choi; Soo-Young Oh; Cheong-Rae Roh; Jong-Hwa Kim
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Sci       Date:  2016-05-13

10.  Diagnostic ability of elevated 1-h glucose challenge test.

Authors:  L A Temming; M G Tuuli; M J Stout; G A Macones; A G Cahill
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2016-01-21       Impact factor: 2.521

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.