Literature DB >> 8971318

Measuring anaesthetic outcomes.

A Lee1, M E Lum.   

Abstract

We have identified some of the most frequently measured anaesthetic outcomes and their independent risk factors, and discussed the limitations and advantages in using various risk adjustment strategies. Many studies suggest that preoperative assessments may contribute to preventing the occurrence of anaesthetic-related morbidity and mortality, and to high levels of patient satisfaction. The use of health status measurements as a preoperative screening tool in assessing anaesthetic risk offers a potential area for future work. Research into measuring anaesthetic outcomes in a reliable and valid manner will be an important tool in improving standards of anaesthetic practice and in delivering quality anaesthesia to our patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8971318     DOI: 10.1177/0310057X9602400610

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anaesth Intensive Care        ISSN: 0310-057X            Impact factor:   1.669


  10 in total

1.  Insertion of self-expanding metal stents for malignant dysphagia: assessment of a simple endoscopic method.

Authors:  J Shenfine; N Hayes; S M Griffiths
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 1.891

Review 2.  Association of peripheral nerve blocks with patient-reported quality of recovery in female patients receiving breast cancer surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies.

Authors:  Kuo-Chuan Hung; Ching-Chung Ko; Jen-Yin Chen; Cheuk-Kwan Sun; Chih-Wei Hsu; Yu-Li Pang
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  2022-07-26       Impact factor: 6.713

3.  Undesirable Postoperative Anesthesia Outcomes at Two National Referral Hospitals: A Cross-Sectional Study in Eritrea.

Authors:  Yonatan Mehari Andemeskel; Traudl Elsholz; Ghidey Gebreyohannes; Eyasu H Tesfamariam
Journal:  Anesthesiol Res Pract       Date:  2020-09-15

Review 4.  Meaningful outcome measures in cardiac surgery.

Authors:  Paul S Myles
Journal:  J Extra Corpor Technol       Date:  2014-03

5.  Assessment of patient satisfaction with the preoperative anesthetic evaluation.

Authors:  Endale Gebreegziabher Gebremedhn; Vidhya Nagaratnam
Journal:  Patient Relat Outcome Meas       Date:  2014-09-16

6.  Validity and reliability of the Iranian version of the quality of recovery-40 questionnaire.

Authors:  Siamak Yaghoobi; Monadi Hamidfar; Douglas M Lawson; Bengt Fridlund; Paul Stewart Myles; Amir H Pakpour
Journal:  Anesth Pain Med       Date:  2015-04-20

7.  Effects of systemic lidocaine versus magnesium administration on postoperative functional recovery and chronic pain in patients undergoing breast cancer surgery: A prospective, randomized, double-blind, comparative clinical trial.

Authors:  Myoung Hwa Kim; Ki Young Lee; Seho Park; Seung Il Kim; Hyung Seok Park; Young Chul Yoo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-03-02       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Successful recovery after major surgery: moving beyond length of stay.

Authors:  Timothy E Miller; Monty Mythen
Journal:  Perioper Med (Lond)       Date:  2014-07-08

Review 9.  Can acute pain treatment reduce postsurgical comorbidity after breast cancer surgery? A literature review.

Authors:  Fumimasa Amaya; Toyoshi Hosokawa; Akiko Okamoto; Megumi Matsuda; Yosuke Yamaguchi; Shunsuke Yamakita; Tetsuya Taguchi; Teiji Sawa
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-10-01       Impact factor: 3.411

10.  Validity and reliability of the Korean version of the Quality of Recovery-15 questionnaire.

Authors:  Jun Ho Lee; Minjong Ki; Seungseo Choi; Cheol Jong Woo; Deokkyu Kim; Hyungsun Lim; Dong-Chan Kim
Journal:  Korean J Anesthesiol       Date:  2020-10-30
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.