OBJECTIVE: To determine the acquisition of host cell-membrane-derived molecules by HIV-1 during the budding process, and to investigate whether the uptake of these molecules is cell-type-specific and selective. DESIGN: Virions, propagated by four different cell types were analysed for the presence of adhesion molecules, glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI)-anchored proteins and various cell-surface markers. The pattern was compared with the phenotype of the HIV-1-infected cell. METHODS: For phenotypic analysis of virions a two-step assay was used. In the first step, virus was captured with monoclonal antibodies (in some cases polyclonal sera) against different cell-membrane proteins. In a second step, the presence of virus was measured by determining the concentration of the virus-specific p24 core antigen. The expression of surface molecules on uninfected and HIV-1IIIB-infected cells was analysed by FACS. RESULTS: Depending on the cell type used for virus propagation, different cell-membrane molecules were found on the virus surface reflecting the corresponding cell type. The uptake of these molecules was selective to a certain degree. No CD4 and CD87 molecules were detectable on HIV-1, although both molecules were present on uninfected and HIV-1-infected cells. CR3 and CDw108 could not be seen on uninfected cells, but wre detectable on infected cells and virions. CONCLUSIONS: During the budding process HIV-1 acquires a variety of cell-type-specific cell-surface molecules. Certain cell-membrane molecules become upregulated during HIV-1-infection and are then found on virions, whereas other molecules remain on the cell surface and do not become incorporated.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the acquisition of host cell-membrane-derived molecules by HIV-1 during the budding process, and to investigate whether the uptake of these molecules is cell-type-specific and selective. DESIGN: Virions, propagated by four different cell types were analysed for the presence of adhesion molecules, glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI)-anchored proteins and various cell-surface markers. The pattern was compared with the phenotype of the HIV-1-infected cell. METHODS: For phenotypic analysis of virions a two-step assay was used. In the first step, virus was captured with monoclonal antibodies (in some cases polyclonal sera) against different cell-membrane proteins. In a second step, the presence of virus was measured by determining the concentration of the virus-specific p24 core antigen. The expression of surface molecules on uninfected and HIV-1IIIB-infected cells was analysed by FACS. RESULTS: Depending on the cell type used for virus propagation, different cell-membrane molecules were found on the virus surface reflecting the corresponding cell type. The uptake of these molecules was selective to a certain degree. No CD4 and CD87 molecules were detectable on HIV-1, although both molecules were present on uninfected and HIV-1-infected cells. CR3 and CDw108 could not be seen on uninfected cells, but wre detectable on infected cells and virions. CONCLUSIONS: During the budding process HIV-1 acquires a variety of cell-type-specific cell-surface molecules. Certain cell-membrane molecules become upregulated during HIV-1-infection and are then found on virions, whereas other molecules remain on the cell surface and do not become incorporated.
Authors: L Kacani; W M Prodinger; G M Sprinzl; M G Schwendinger; M Spruth; H Stoiber; S Döpper; S Steinhuber; F Steindl; M P Dierich Journal: J Virol Date: 2000-09 Impact factor: 5.103
Authors: T R Zaccariotto; E T Rosim; D Melo; P M D Garcia; R R Munhoz; F H Aoki; M de Fatima Sonati Journal: J Clin Pathol Date: 2006-05 Impact factor: 3.411
Authors: Cherry Kingsley; Barry Peters; Kaboutar Babaahmady; Laura Pomeroy; Durdana Rahman; Robert Vaughan; Thomas Lehner Journal: PLoS One Date: 2009-11-23 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Barbara Falkensammer; Barbara Rubner; Alexander Hiltgartner; Doris Wilflingseder; Christiane Stahl Hennig; Seraphin Kuate; Klaus Uberla; Stephen Norley; Alexander Strasak; Paul Racz; Heribert Stoiber Journal: Retrovirology Date: 2009-06-21 Impact factor: 4.602