Literature DB >> 897030

Mixed motives in the kitchen--current recipes for improving quality of care.

P R May, T W Keller.   

Abstract

Program evaluation is a new field vested with high and often unrealistic and conflicting expectations from many quarters. Instead of being clear and realistic, evaluators have tended to react blindly to the various demands, compounding the confusion by engaging in unproved, even potentially counterproductive, efforts. A more constructive type of evaluation is needed--a cooperative enterprise in which information is obtained as a service for a client, with his full and meaningful participation in designing the evaluation and in the interpretation and implementation of the results.

Mesh:

Year:  1977        PMID: 897030     DOI: 10.1007/bf01115318

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychiatr Q        ISSN: 0033-2720


  4 in total

Review 1.  The reliability of clinical methods, data and judgments (first of two parts).

Authors:  L M Koran
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1975-09-25       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Quality-of-care assessment: choosing a method for peer review.

Authors:  R H Brook; F A Appel
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1973-06-21       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Service quality profile. Development of a technique for measuring quality of mental health services.

Authors:  J Zusman; M R Slawson
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  1972-11

4.  Differing perspectives on mental health evaluation.

Authors:  G Spivack; C H St Clair; J Siegel; J J Platt
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  1975-12       Impact factor: 18.112

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.