Literature DB >> 8970247

Clinical experience with brimonidine 0.2% and timolol 0.5% in glaucoma and ocular hypertension.

J S Schuman1.   

Abstract

The ocular hypotensive efficacy and safety of brimonidine tartrate 0.2%, a highly selective alpha 2-adrenergic agonist, was compared with that of timolol 0.5%, a nonselective beta-blocker in two multicenter, randomized, double-masked studies. Combined data from a 12-month completed study and 6-month interim data from an ongoing study are reported. Efficacy and safety were evaluated at baseline, weeks 1 and 2, and months 1, 2, 3, 6, 9, and 12. Intraocular pressure (IOP) was measured at peak (2 hours after the morning dose) and trough (12 hours after the evening dose). Patients (n = 926) instilled either brimonidine tartrate 0.2% or timolol maleate 0.5% twice daily. At peak, the mean decreases from baseline IOP ranged from 5.9 +/- 3.2 mm Hg to 7.6 +/- 3.6 mm Hg for brimonidine and 6.0 +/- 3.4 mm Hg to 6.6 +/- 3.6 mm Hg for timolol (p < 0.001 within groups compared with baseline). No significant between-group differences were seen at peak except for weeks 1 and 2 and month 3 (p < or = 0.04), when brimonidine had lower mean IOP. At trough the mean decreases from baseline ranged from 3.7 +/- 4.0 mm Hg to 5.0 +/- 3.0 mm Hg for brimonidine and 5.9 +/- 3.4 to 6.6 +/- 3.0 for timolol. A significant between-group difference was seen at trough at all visits (< 0.001), when timolol had a lower mean IOP. Brimonidine and timolol showed sustained efficacy. Both drugs were well-tolerated. The brimonidine group had more ocular allergy, oral dryness and conjunctival follicles. The timolol group had more burning and stinging. In the brimonidine group, 38/513 (7.4%) discontinued treatment due to ocular allergy. The timolol group had significantly lower mean heart rate compared to baseline. The effect on blood pressure was minimal for both drugs. Brimonidine showed efficacy similar to timolol and a relatively low rate of ocular allergy. Brimonidine 0.2% administered twice daily is an effective and safe ocular hypotensive agent that maintains IOP-lowering in chronic use.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8970247     DOI: 10.1016/s0039-6257(96)82029-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surv Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0039-6257            Impact factor:   6.048


  16 in total

Review 1.  Efficacy and adverse effects of medications used in the treatment of glaucoma.

Authors:  C B Camras; C B Toris; R R Tamesis
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 3.923

2.  A comparison of the fixed combination of latanoprost and timolol with the unfixed combination of brimonidine and timolol in patients with elevated intraocular pressure. A six month, evaluator masked, multicentre study in Europe.

Authors:  J García-Sánchez; J-F Rouland; D Spiegel; B Pajic; I Cunliffe; C Traverso; J Landry
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 4.638

Review 3.  Pharmacological therapy for glaucoma: a review.

Authors:  P F Hoyng; L M van Beek
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 4.  Topical brimonidine 0.2%/timolol 0.5% ophthalmic solution: in glaucoma and ocular hypertension.

Authors:  James E Frampton
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 3.923

Review 5.  Management of glaucoma: focus on pharmacological therapy.

Authors:  Robert E Marquis; Jess T Whitson
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 3.923

Review 6.  Brimonidine. A review of its pharmacological properties and clinical potential in the management of open-angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension.

Authors:  J C Adkins; J A Balfour
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 3.923

7.  Unoprostone as adjunctive therapy to timolol: a double masked randomised study versus brimonidine and dorzolamide.

Authors:  A Hommer; B Kapik; N Shams
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 4.638

8.  Brimonidine purite 0.15% versus dorzolamide 2% each given twice daily to reduce intraocular pressure in subjects with open angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension.

Authors:  E D Sharpe; D G Day; C J Beischel; J S Rhodes; J A Stewart; W C Stewart
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 4.638

9.  Targeted delivery of antiglaucoma drugs to the supraciliary space using microneedles.

Authors:  Yoo C Kim; Henry F Edelhauser; Mark R Prausnitz
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2014-09-11       Impact factor: 4.799

Review 10.  Medical interventions for primary open angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension.

Authors:  C Vass; C Hirn; T Sycha; O Findl; P Bauer; L Schmetterer
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2007-10-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.