BACKGROUND: This study determined the accuracy of previously defined adult fentanyl pharmacokinetics in children having surgery; from this population, the pharmacokinetics of fentanyl were characterized in children when administered via a computerized assisted continuous-infusion device. METHODS: Twenty children between the ages of 2.7 and 11 y scheduled to undergo elective noncardiac surgery were studied. After induction, anesthesia was maintained with 60% nitrous oxide in oxygen supplemented with fentanyl (n = 10) or fentanyl plus isoflurane (n = 10). Fentanyl was administered via computerized assisted continuous-infusion to target concentrations determined by clinical requirements. Plasma fentanyl concentrations were measured and used to evaluate the performance of the fentanyl pharmacokinetics and then to determine a new set of pharmacokinetic parameters and the variance in the context-sensitive half-times simulated for these patients. RESULTS: The original adult fentanyl pharmacokinetics resulted in a positive bias (10.4%), indicating that measured concentrations were mostly greater than predicted. A two-compartment model with age and weight as covariates provided the optimal pharmacokinetic parameters. These resulted in a residual performance error of -1.1% and a median absolute performance error of 17.4%. The context-sensitive times determined from this pediatric population were considerably shorter than the context-sensitive times previously published for adults. CONCLUSIONS: The pharmacokinetics of fentanyl administered by computerized assisted continuous-infusion differ between adults and children. The newly derived parameters are probably more suitable to determine infusion schemes of up to 4 h in children between the ages of 2 and 11 y.
BACKGROUND: This study determined the accuracy of previously defined adult fentanyl pharmacokinetics in children having surgery; from this population, the pharmacokinetics of fentanyl were characterized in children when administered via a computerized assisted continuous-infusion device. METHODS: Twenty children between the ages of 2.7 and 11 y scheduled to undergo elective noncardiac surgery were studied. After induction, anesthesia was maintained with 60% nitrous oxide in oxygen supplemented with fentanyl (n = 10) or fentanyl plus isoflurane (n = 10). Fentanyl was administered via computerized assisted continuous-infusion to target concentrations determined by clinical requirements. Plasma fentanyl concentrations were measured and used to evaluate the performance of the fentanyl pharmacokinetics and then to determine a new set of pharmacokinetic parameters and the variance in the context-sensitive half-times simulated for these patients. RESULTS: The original adult fentanyl pharmacokinetics resulted in a positive bias (10.4%), indicating that measured concentrations were mostly greater than predicted. A two-compartment model with age and weight as covariates provided the optimal pharmacokinetic parameters. These resulted in a residual performance error of -1.1% and a median absolute performance error of 17.4%. The context-sensitive times determined from this pediatric population were considerably shorter than the context-sensitive times previously published for adults. CONCLUSIONS: The pharmacokinetics of fentanyl administered by computerized assisted continuous-infusion differ between adults and children. The newly derived parameters are probably more suitable to determine infusion schemes of up to 4 h in children between the ages of 2 and 11 y.
Authors: Ashley M Gesseck; Justin L Poklis; Carl E Wolf; Jie Xu; Aamir Bashir; Karen D Hendricks-Muñoz; Michelle R Peace Journal: J Anal Toxicol Date: 2020-10-12 Impact factor: 3.367
Authors: Victoria C Ziesenitz; Janelle D Vaughns; Gilbert Koch; Gerd Mikus; Johannes N van den Anker Journal: Clin Pharmacokinet Date: 2018-03 Impact factor: 6.447
Authors: Bethany W Ibach; Jamie L Miller; Sukyung Woo; Donald Harrison; Kelly M Standifer; Tracy Hagemann; Peter N Johnson Journal: J Pediatr Intensive Care Date: 2016-06-29
Authors: Sara L Van Driest; Matthew D Marshall; Brian Hachey; Cole Beck; Kim Crum; Jill Owen; Andrew H Smith; Prince J Kannankeril; Alison Woodworth; Richard M Caprioli; Leena Choi Journal: Br J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2016-04-15 Impact factor: 4.335
Authors: Victoria C Ziesenitz; Janelle D Vaughns; Gilbert Koch; Gerd Mikus; Johannes N van den Anker Journal: Clin Pharmacokinet Date: 2018-02 Impact factor: 6.447
Authors: Anil R Maharaj; Huali Wu; Kanecia O Zimmerman; David G Speicher; Janice E Sullivan; Kevin Watt; Amira Al-Uzri; Elizabeth H Payne; Jinson Erinjeri; Susan Lin; Barrie Harper; Chiara Melloni; Christoph P Hornik Journal: J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2019-12-08 Impact factor: 2.860