Literature DB >> 8962588

The cost of poor birth outcomes in employer-sponsored health plans.

D J Chollet1, J F Newman, A T Sumner.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The authors examine the cost and incidence of poor birth outcomes in employer-sponsored health insurance plans.
METHODS: An extensive study of national inpatient and outpatient claims data for prenatal, delivery, and postnatal care of nearly 59,000 mother-infant pairs was conducted. All maternal and infant costs incurred over a 2-year period were analyzed, and, furthermore, the longitudinal claims experience of a cohort of 20,000 mothers and infants was examined in detail.
RESULTS: The study revealed that 25% of deliveries resulted in poor birth outcomes, which accounted for 40% of total costs over a 2-year period. Extrapolated nationwide, the net direct medical care cost of poor birth outcomes in employer plans has been estimated at approximately $5.6 billion for 1990, approximately 3% of aggregate after-tax corporate profits that year.
CONCLUSIONS: Costs related to maternity and infant care are a major source of cost for employer-sponsored health insurance plans. Poor birth outcomes represent significantly higher cost for both the mother and infant at all stages of care-prenatal, at birth, and postnatal. To the extent that poor birth outcomes relate to maternal behavior and are preventable, their very high and protracted cost may justify substantial health promotion activity by employers and insurers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8962588     DOI: 10.1097/00005650-199612000-00007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Care        ISSN: 0025-7079            Impact factor:   2.983


  3 in total

1.  Learning needs as perceived by women less than or equal to 16 weeks pregnant.

Authors:  Y A Camiletti; R Alder
Journal:  Can J Public Health       Date:  1999 Jul-Aug

2.  Reevaluating the relationship between prenatal employment and birth outcomes: a policy-relevant application of propensity score matching.

Authors:  Katy B Kozhimannil; Laura B Attanasio; Patricia M McGovern; Dwenda K Gjerdingen; Pamela Jo Johnson
Journal:  Womens Health Issues       Date:  2012-12-21

3.  The business case for preconception care: methods and issues.

Authors:  Scott D Grosse; Sergey V Sotnikov; Sheila Leatherman; Michele Curtis
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2006-09
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.