Literature DB >> 8962553

High dose adenosine stress echocardiography for noninvasive detection of coronary artery disease.

A D Djordjevic-Dikic1, M C Ostojic, B D Beleslin, J Stepanovic, Z Petrasinovic, R Babic, S M Stojkovic, G Stankovic, M Nedeljkovic, I Nedeljkovic, V Kanjuh.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to assess the tolerability and incremental diagnostic value of high adenosine doses in stress echocardiography testing in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD).
BACKGROUND: In comparison with other pharmacologic stress echocardiography tests, standard dose adenosine stress has sub-optimal sensitivity for detecting milder forms of CAD.
METHODS: Adenosine stress echocardiography was performed in 58 patients using a starting dose of 100 micrograms/kg body weight per min over 3 min followed by 140 micrograms/kg per min over 4 min (standard dose). If no new wall motion abnormality appeared, the dose was increased to 200 micrograms/kg per min over 4 min (high dose). All patients underwent coronary angiography. Significant CAD was defined as > or = 50% diameter stenosis in at least one major coronary artery. Thirty-three patients had one-vessel and seven had multivessel CAD. Coronary angiographic findings were normal in 18 patients.
RESULTS: The high adenosine dose caused a slight but significant increase over baseline values in rate-pressure product. Limiting side effects occurred in two patients during the standard dose protocol and in one patient receiving the high dose regimen. The test was stopped in 30 patients after the standard adenosine dose regimen because of a provoked new wall motion abnormality. The sensitivity of adenosine echocardiography with the standard dose was 75% (95% confidence interval [CI] 63% to 87%). After completion of the standard dose protocol, 28 patients continued testing with the high dose adenosine protocol. The overall sensitivity of adenosine echocardiography, calculated as cumulative, increased to 92% (95% CI 84% to 100%) with the high dose (p < 0.05). The specificity of adenosine testing was 100% and 88%, respectively, with the standard and high dose regimen (p = 0.617).
CONCLUSIONS: We believe that use of a higher than usual adenosine dose protocol for stress testing may improve the diagnostic value of adenosine echocardiography, mainly by increasing sensitivity in patients with single-vessel disease without deterioration of the safety profile and with only a mild reduction in specificity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8962553     DOI: 10.1016/S0735-1097(96)00374-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  10 in total

1.  A meta-analytic comparison of echocardiographic stressors.

Authors:  Yoshinori Noguchi; Shizuko Nagata-Kobayashi; James E Stahl; John B Wong
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2005 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.357

2.  Stress echocardiography: the long and winding road from meta-analysis to bedside.

Authors:  Eugenio Picano
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2005 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 3.  Stress echocardiography for the detection and assessment of coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Nowell M Fine; Patricia A Pellikka
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 5.952

4.  Temporal analysis of regional strain rate during adenosine triphosphate stress before and after percutaneous coronary interventions.

Authors:  Kazue Gunji; Atsushi Takagi; Kotaro Arai; Kyomi Ashihara; Nobuhisa Hagiwara
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2014-03-15       Impact factor: 2.037

Review 5.  Adenosine triphosphate: established and potential clinical applications.

Authors:  H J Agteresch; P C Dagnelie; J W van den Berg; J H Wilson
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 9.546

6.  Myocardial blood flow is the dominant factor influencing cardiac magnetic resonance adenosine stress T2.

Authors:  Jill J Weyers; Venkat Ramanan; Ahsan Javed; Jennifer Barry; Melissa Larsen; Krishna Nayak; Graham A Wright; Nilesh R Ghugre
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2021-11-17       Impact factor: 4.044

7.  Feasibility and safety of high-dose adenosine perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance.

Authors:  Theodoros D Karamitsos; Ntobeko A B Ntusi; Jane M Francis; Cameron J Holloway; Saul G Myerson; Stefan Neubauer
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2010-11-16       Impact factor: 5.364

8.  Stress echocardiography for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease: an evidence-based analysis.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2010-06-01

9.  The quantification of dipyridamole induced changes in regional deformation in normal, stunned or infarcted myocardium as measured by strain and strain rate: an experimental study.

Authors:  Maciej Marciniak; Piet Claus; Witold Streb; Anna Marciniak; Petra Boettler; Myles McLaughlin; Jan D'hooge; Frank Rademakers; Bart Bijnens; George R Sutherland
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2007-10-02       Impact factor: 2.357

10.  Combined myocardial stress perfusion imaging and myocardial stress tagging for detection of coronary artery disease at 3 Tesla.

Authors:  Daniel Thomas; Katharina Strach; Carsten Meyer; Claas P Naehle; Sebastian Schaare; Sven Wasmann; Hans H Schild; Torsten Sommer
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2008-12-18       Impact factor: 5.364

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.