Literature DB >> 8962551

Myocardial contrast echocardiography versus dobutamine echocardiography for predicting functional recovery after acute myocardial infarction treated with primary coronary angioplasty.

L Bolognese1, D Antoniucci, D Rovai, P Buonamici, G Cerisano, G M Santoro, C Marini, A L'Abbate, P F Fazzini.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: We sought to compare myocardial contrast echocardiography with low dose dobutamine echocardiography for predicting 1-month recovery of ventricular function in acute myocardial infarction treated with primary coronary angioplasty.
BACKGROUND: The relation between myocardial perfusion and contractile reserve in patients with acute myocardial infarction, in whom anterograde flow is fully restored without significant residual stenosis, is still unclear.
METHODS: Thirty patients with acute myocardial infarction treated successfully with primary coronary angioplasty underwent intracoronary contrast echocardiography before and after angioplasty and dobutamine echocardiography 3 days after the index infarction. One month later, two-dimensional echocardiography and coronary angiography were repeated in all patients and contrast echocardiography in 18 patients.
RESULTS: After coronary recanalization, 26 patients showed myocardial reperfusion within the risk area, although 4 did not. At 1-month follow-up, all patients had a patient infarct-related artery without significant restenosis. Both left ventricular ejection fraction and wall motion score index within the risk area significantly improved in the patients with reperfusion ([mean +/- SD] 38 +/- 8% vs. 48 +/- 12%, p < 0.005; and 2.35 +/- 0.5 vs. 2 +/- 0.6, p < 0.001, respectively), but not in those with no reflow. Of the 72 nonperfused segments before angioplasty, 27 showed functional improvement at follow-up. Myocardial contrast echocardiography had a sensitivity and a negative predictive value similar to dobutamine echocardiography in predicting late functional recovery (96% vs. 89% and 89% vs. 93%, respectively), but a lower specificity (18% vs. 91%, p < 0.001), positive predictive value (41% vs. 86%, p < 0.001) and overall accuracy (47% vs. 90%, p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Microvascular integrity is a prerequisite for myocardial viability after acute myocardial infarction. However, contrast enhancement shortly after recanalization does not necessarily imply a late functional improvement. Thus, contractile reserve elicited by low dose dobutamine is a more accurate predictor of regional functional recovery after reperfused acute myocardial infarction than microvascular integrity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8962551     DOI: 10.1016/S0735-1097(96)00400-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  14 in total

Review 1.  Added value of contrast echocardiography in assessing myocardial viability.

Authors:  A Nagy; F L Dini; D Rovai
Journal:  Heart       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 5.994

2.  Acute assessment of microvascular perfusion patterns by myocardial contrast echocardiography during myocardial infarction: relation to timing and extent of functional recovery.

Authors:  D Czitrom; D Karila-Cohen; E Brochet; J M Juliard; M Faraggi; M C Aumont; P Assayag; P G Steg
Journal:  Heart       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 5.994

3.  Assessment of myocardial perfusion abnormalities by intravenous myocardial contrast echocardiography with harmonic power Doppler imaging: comparison with positron emission tomography.

Authors:  T Muro; T Hozumi; H Watanabe; H Yamagishi; M Yoshiyama; K Takeuchi; J Yoshikawa
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 5.994

4.  Can coronary flow velocity reserve determined by transthoracic Doppler echocardiography predict the recovery of regional left ventricular function in patients with acute myocardial infarction?

Authors:  Y Ueno; Y Nakamura; M Kinoshita; T Fujita; T Sakamoto; H Okamura
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 5.994

5.  Coronary No-reflow Phenomenon.

Authors:  Shereif H Rezkalla; Robert A Kloner
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2005-05

6.  Intravenous myocardial contrast echocardiography predicts regional and global left ventricular remodelling after acute myocardial infarction: comparison with low dose dobutamine stress echocardiography.

Authors:  Y Abe; T Muro; Y Sakanoue; R Komatsu; M Otsuka; T Naruko; A Itoh; M Yoshiyama; K Haze; J Yoshikawa
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2005-03-29       Impact factor: 5.994

7.  Resting qualitative and quantitative myocardial contrast echocardiography to predict cardiac events in patients with acute myocardial infarction and percutaneous revascularization.

Authors:  Sahar S Abdelmoneim; Matthew W Martinez; Sunil V Mankad; Mathieu Bernier; Abhijeet Dhoble; Patricia A Pellikka; Krishnaswamy Chandrasekaran; Jae K Oh; Sharon L Mulvagh
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2014-01-10       Impact factor: 2.037

Review 8.  Reperfusion revisited: beyond TIMI 3 flow.

Authors:  J P Gassler; E J Topol
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 2.882

9.  Myocardial contrast echocardiography for predicting functional recovery after acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Adrian C Borges; Wolf S Richter; Christian Witzel; Matthias Witzel; Andrea Grohmann; Rona K Reibis; Wolfgang Rutsch; Ingeborg Küchler; Dieter L Munz; Gert Baumann
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 2.357

10.  Single Tc99m Sestamibi injection, double acquisition gated SPECT after stress and during low-dose dobutamine infusion: a new suggested protocol for evaluation of myocardial perfusion.

Authors:  Babak Fallahi; Davood Beiki; Ali Gholamrezanezhad; Babak Mahmoudian; Kianoush Ansari Gilani; Mohammad Eftekhari; Armaghan Fard-Esfahani; Zhila Mohseni; Mohsen Saghari
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2008-06-18       Impact factor: 2.357

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.