Literature DB >> 8962538

Landmark stability: further studies pointing to a role in spatial learning.

R Biegler1, R G Morris.   

Abstract

Two experiments were conducted to investigate the possible role of landmark stability in spatial learning. Rats were trained to search in a large arena for food hidden at a consistent distance and direction from either a single radially symmetric landmark or an array of two landmarks. We varied the relative degree to which the landmark array and/or the cues of the training context predicted the location of food, without varying the conditional probability of food being available given either cue. Experiment 1 used vestibular disorientation to ensure control of search location by experimenter-controlled cues. The results showed that making either a single landmark or a cluster of two adjacent landmarks the sole spatial predictor of reward location reduced the accuracy of search compared to a condition where both the landmark array and context cues were reliable spatial predictors. Varying global landmark stability had no effect when training was conducted using an array of two landmarks located some distance from each other. Context cues, when tested alone, triggered very little searching in appropriate locations, and the absolute magnitude of control over search was insufficient to account for the superiority of stable landmarks. The better learning with a stable landmark, and the dependence of this effect on the geometrical arrangement of landmarks, points to the conditions of spatial learning involving additional principles to those of simple associative conditioning. Experiment 2 examined landmark stability using a single landmark and fixed directional cues in the absence of vestibular disorientation. This also revealed a relative advantage of landmark stability, but animals with a landmark that moved from trial to trial did show some evidence of learning. Context cues when tested alone had minimal influence. Parametric manipulation of landmark stability offers a novel way of influencing spatial learning and thus understanding better the process through which egocentric representations of perceived space are transformed into allocentric representations of the real world.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8962538     DOI: 10.1080/713932636

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol B        ISSN: 0272-4995


  8 in total

1.  Spatial configuration and list learning of proximally cued arms by rats in the enclosed four-arm radial maze.

Authors:  Joseph Tremblay; Jerome Cohen
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 1.986

2.  Spatial and nonspatial escape strategies in the Barnes maze.

Authors:  Fiona E Harrison; Randall S Reiserer; Andrew J Tomarken; Michael P McDonald
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2006-11-13       Impact factor: 2.460

Review 3.  Framing spatial cognition: neural representations of proximal and distal frames of reference and their roles in navigation.

Authors:  James J Knierim; Derek A Hamilton
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 37.312

4.  Landmark discrimination learning in the dog.

Authors:  N W Milgram; B Adams; H Callahan; E Head; B Mackay; C Thirlwell; C W Cotman
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  1999 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.460

Review 5.  Hippocampal synaptic plasticity: role in spatial learning or the automatic recording of attended experience?

Authors:  R G Morris; U Frey
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1997-10-29       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  Evidence consistent with the multiple-bearings hypothesis from human virtual landmark-based navigation.

Authors:  Martha R Forloines; Kent D Bodily; Bradley R Sturz
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-04-28

7.  Failure to demonstrate short-cutting in a replication and extension of Tolman et al.'s spatial learning experiment with humans.

Authors:  Stuart P Wilson; Paul N Wilson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-12-26       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Retrosplenial cortex codes for permanent landmarks.

Authors:  Stephen D Auger; Sinéad L Mullally; Eleanor A Maguire
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-08-17       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.