Literature DB >> 8961785

Cortical correlates of semantic classical conditioning.

P Montoya1, W Larbig, F Pulvermüller, H Flor, N Birbaumer.   

Abstract

Event-related potentials to visually displayed pseudowords were registered from 13 individuals. In a differential conditioning paradigm, half of the pseudowords had previously been paired with a painful electric shock (shock words) and the other half had been presented without shock (nonshock words). Participants were asked to decide if the words had been presented during the conditioning phase or not. Larger N100 amplitudes and a more negative-going slow wave 400-800 ms after word presentation were found for shock as compared with nonshock words. This effect was stronger over the left than over the right hemisphere. This left-lateralized negativity might reflect the activation of a cell assembly representing the memory of the learned word-shock contingency. Furthermore, the increased N100 amplitude elicited by shock as compared with nonshock words may be interpreted as an increased attentive facilitation for aversive pain-related information as a consequence of conditioning.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8961785     DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1996.tb02359.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychophysiology        ISSN: 0048-5772            Impact factor:   4.016


  9 in total

1.  Associated valence impacts early visual processing of letter strings: Evidence from ERPs in a cross-modal learning paradigm.

Authors:  Mareike Bayer; Annika Grass; Annekathrin Schacht
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 3.282

2.  How 'love' and 'hate' differ from 'sleep': using combined electro/magnetoencephalographic data to reveal the sources of early cortical responses to emotional words.

Authors:  Kati Keuper; Peter Zwanzger; Marisa Nordt; Annuschka Eden; Inga Laeger; Pienie Zwitserlood; Johanna Kissler; Markus Junghöfer; Christian Dobel
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2012-12-26       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Effects of classical conditioning on identification and cortical processing of speech syllables.

Authors:  Sabine Heim; Andreas Keil
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-06-10       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  An evil face? Verbal evaluative multi-CS conditioning enhances face-evoked mid-latency magnetoencephalographic responses.

Authors:  Markus Junghöfer; Maimu Alissa Rehbein; Julius Maitzen; Sebastian Schindler; Johanna Kissler
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2017-04-01       Impact factor: 3.436

5.  Semantic classical conditioning and brain-computer interface control: encoding of affirmative and negative thinking.

Authors:  Carolin A Ruf; Daniele De Massari; Adrian Furdea; Tamara Matuz; Chiara Fioravanti; Linda van der Heiden; Sebastian Halder; Niels Birbaumer
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2013-03-07       Impact factor: 4.677

6.  Fatigue sensation induced by the sounds associated with mental fatigue and its related neural activities: revealed by magnetoencephalography.

Authors:  Akira Ishii; Masaaki Tanaka; Masayoshi Iwamae; Chongsoo Kim; Emi Yamano; Yasuyoshi Watanabe
Journal:  Behav Brain Funct       Date:  2013-06-13       Impact factor: 3.759

7.  Insula and inferior frontal triangularis activations distinguish between conditioned brain responses using emotional sounds for basic BCI communication.

Authors:  Linda van der Heiden; Giulia Liberati; Ranganatha Sitaram; Sunjung Kim; Piotr Jaśkowski; Antonino Raffone; Marta Olivetti Belardinelli; Niels Birbaumer; Ralf Veit
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2014-07-21       Impact factor: 3.558

8.  Social Pavlovian conditioning: Short- and long-term effects and the role of anxiety and depressive symptoms.

Authors:  Nicole Wiggert; Frank H Wilhelm; Sabrina Boger; Claudio Georgii; Wolfgang Klimesch; Jens Blechert
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 3.436

9.  Long-Term Visuo-Gustatory Appetitive and Aversive Conditioning Potentiate Human Visual Evoked Potentials.

Authors:  Gert R J Christoffersen; Jakob L Laugesen; Per Møller; Wender L P Bredie; Todd R Schachtman; Christina Liljendahl; Ida Viemose
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2017-09-21       Impact factor: 3.169

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.