Literature DB >> 8961368

Neuropsychometric evaluation of long-term survivors of adult brain tumours: relationship with tumour and treatment parameters.

A Gregor1, A Cull, E Traynor, M Stewart, F Lander, S Love.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cognitive deficits are the hallmark of dose limiting late radiation morbidity in the CNS. Little is known about the neuropsychometric morbidity of treatment in adults with primary brain tumours. We set out to evaluate systematically the neuropsychometric function of all long-term survivors in order to document the frequency and severity of impairment and study its relationship with tumour and treatment related parameters.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: 30 patients surviving in clinical and radiological remission for > 4 years following irradiation were recalled for clinical examination, CT/MRI scan and neuropsychometric testing. The 14 males, 16 females, (mean age 42.5 years), represented all but one long term survivors treated with radiotherapy in the Department of Clinical Oncology between 1971 and 1990. Twenty-five patients had a histological diagnosis of glioma. Patients treated before 1987 (n = 16) received whole brain irradiation (WBI); focused irradiation (FI) has been used since (n = 14).
RESULTS: The two groups were similar were in age, initial tumour type and surgical treatment, but the WBI group showed more evidence of neuropsychometric impairment than the FI group with significantly lower group median scores in tests of visuospatial organisation (WAIS Block Design, P = 0.01), visual memory (Rey Complex figure, P = 0.003) and complex information processing (Trails A, P = 0.003; Trails B, P = 0.002). Pre-morbid IQ estimated from sociodemographic variables, was comparable in the 2 groups which were not significantly different in their emotional state as assessed by the HADS. On univariate analysis radiation volume (P = 0.05) and time from treatment (P = 0.02) were the main factors associated with neuropsychometric deficit. Multivariate analysis by logistic regression confirmed WBI as the only independent predictor of neuropsychometric impairment (WBI vs. FI, odds ratio = 7.1, 95% C.I. 1.2-42.3, P = 0.03).
CONCLUSIONS: Neuropsychometric deficits are common and can be related to time from treatment and radiation technique. Neuropsychometric testing can be a useful tool in the evaluation of different treatment strategies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8961368     DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8140(96)91782-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiother Oncol        ISSN: 0167-8140            Impact factor:   6.280


  29 in total

Review 1.  Radiation dose-volume effects in the brain.

Authors:  Yaacov Richard Lawrence; X Allen Li; Issam el Naqa; Carol A Hahn; Lawrence B Marks; Thomas E Merchant; Adam P Dicker
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2010-03-01       Impact factor: 7.038

2.  Serial diffusion tensor imaging to characterize radiation-induced changes in normal-appearing white matter following radiotherapy in patients with adult low-grade gliomas.

Authors:  Mohammad Haris; Shaleen Kumar; Mani Karthick Raj; Koilpillai Joseph Maria Das; Shantanu Sapru; Sanjay Behari; Ram Kishore Singh Rathore; Ponnada A Narayana; Rakesh Kumar Gupta
Journal:  Radiat Med       Date:  2008-04

3.  A randomized trial of cognitive rehabilitation in cancer survivors.

Authors:  M M Cherrier; K Anderson; D David; C S Higano; H Gray; A Church; S L Willis
Journal:  Life Sci       Date:  2013-09-05       Impact factor: 5.037

4.  The use of a simple Likert scale to measure quality of life in brain tumor patients.

Authors:  M P Rogers; J Orav; P M Black
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 4.130

5.  Computer-based assessment of cognitive functions in brain tumor patients.

Authors:  Klaus Fliessbach; Sabine Rogowski; Christian Hoppe; Michael Sabel; Mathias Goeppert; Christoph Helmstaedter; Pasquale Calabrese; Gabriele Schackert; Joerg-Christian Tonn; Matthias Simon; Uwe Schlegel
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2010-05-07       Impact factor: 4.130

6.  The course of neurocognitive functioning in high-grade glioma patients.

Authors:  Ingeborg Bosma; Maaike J Vos; Jan J Heimans; Martin J B Taphoorn; Neil K Aaronson; Tjeerd J Postma; Henk M van der Ploeg; Martin Muller; W Peter Vandertop; Ben J Slotman; Martin Klein
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2006-10-03       Impact factor: 12.300

Review 7.  The quality of measurement properties of neurocognitive assessment in brain tumor clinical trials over the last 30 years: a COSMIN checklist-based approach.

Authors:  Maria De Martino; Barbara Santini; Giovanna Cappelletti; Annapina Mazzotta; Matteo Rasi; Giorgia Bulgarelli; Luciano Annicchiarico; Alessandro Marcocci; Andrea Talacchi
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2020-07-12       Impact factor: 3.307

8.  Pitfalls in the assessment of disability in individuals with low-grade gliomas.

Authors:  Anneli Påhlson; Lena Ek; Gerd Ahlström; Anja Smits
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 4.130

9.  Maintenance of white matter integrity in a rat model of radiation-induced cognitive impairment.

Authors:  Lei Shi; M Constance Linville; Elizabeth Iversen; Doris P Molina; Jessie Yester; Kenneth T Wheeler; Michael E Robbins; Judy K Brunso-Bechtold
Journal:  J Neurol Sci       Date:  2009-07-21       Impact factor: 3.181

10.  Neurocognitive training in patients with high-grade glioma: a pilot study.

Authors:  Marco Ronald Hassler; Katarzyna Elandt; Matthias Preusser; Johann Lehrner; Petra Binder; Karin Dieckmann; Andrea Rottenfusser; Christine Marosi
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2009-09-10       Impact factor: 4.130

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.