Literature DB >> 8960991

The incidence of congenital malformations in a Turkish population.

O Himmetoglu1, M B Tiras, R Gursoy, O Karabacak, I Sahin, A Onan.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the incidence and types of congenital anomalies in a Turkish population.
METHOD: The total number of neonates (9160) born in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Gazi University Faculty of Medicine during 1988-1995 were studied retrospectively. Newborns with congenital anomaly were identified from their birth registries. The total incidence, types and combined anomalies were determined. Also, the relationship between congenital anomalies and maternal age and/or gender were investigated. For statistical evaluation, Chi-square test, Yates correction and Fisher's exact tests were used where appropriate.
RESULTS: The overall congenital anomaly incidence was 1.11% and the NTD incidence was 0.27% in our population. Anencephaly was the second most common NTDs with the ratio of 40%, following the spina bifida cases. There was a significant difference between female and male newborns with ancephalocele (P < 0.05). Urogenital system anomalies were found to be the second most common type of malformation with an incidence of 0.21%. Facial and musculoskeletal system abnormalities were the third and fourth most common malformations. Omphalocele incidence in our population was 5 in 9160 births and gastrochisis was 1 in 9160 births.
CONCLUSION: The overall congenital anomaly incidence in newborns in our population is 1.11%. The most common malformations were CNS and urogenital abnormalities. NTDs incidence was 0.27% in a Turkish population.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8960991     DOI: 10.1016/s0020-7292(96)02743-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet        ISSN: 0020-7292            Impact factor:   3.561


  7 in total

1.  How does pregnancy affect the patients with pituitary adenomas: a study on 113 pregnancies from Turkey.

Authors:  Z Karaca; S Yarman; I Ozbas; P Kadioglu; M Akturk; F Kilicli; H S Dokmetas; R Colak; H Atmaca; Z Canturk; Y Altuntas; N Ozbey; N Hatipoglu; F Tanriverdi; K Unluhizarci; F Kelestimur
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  2017-06-20       Impact factor: 4.256

2.  Prevalence of congenital malformations at the "les Orangers" maternity and reproductive health Hospital of Rabat: descriptive study of 470 anomalies.

Authors:  K Forci; M H Alami; E Bouaiti; M Slaoui; A Mdaghri Alaoui; A Thimou Izgua
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2020-06-03       Impact factor: 2.125

3.  The birth prevalence of selected major congenital anomalies: Six-year's experience in a tertiary care maternity hospital.

Authors:  Dursun Türkbay; Fuat Emre Canpolat; Turan Derme; Nahide Altuğ; Yavuz Yılmaz
Journal:  Turk Pediatri Ars       Date:  2020-12-16

4.  Evaluation of neural tube defects from 2014 to 2019 in Turkey.

Authors:  Nilgün Çaylan; Sıddıka Songül Yalçin; Başak Tezel; Şirin Aydin; Oben Üner; Fatih Kara
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2022-04-19       Impact factor: 3.007

5.  Birth defects in Iraq and the plausibility of environmental exposure: A review.

Authors:  Tariq S Al-Hadithi; Jawad K Al-Diwan; Abubakir M Saleh; Nazar P Shabila
Journal:  Confl Health       Date:  2012-07-28       Impact factor: 2.723

Review 6.  Describing the Prevalence of Neural Tube Defects Worldwide: A Systematic Literature Review.

Authors:  Ibrahim Zaganjor; Ahlia Sekkarie; Becky L Tsang; Jennifer Williams; Hilda Razzaghi; Joseph Mulinare; Joseph E Sniezek; Michael J Cannon; Jorge Rosenthal
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-04-11       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Retreatment Predictions in Odontology by means of CBR Systems.

Authors:  Livia Campo; Ignacio J Aliaga; Juan F De Paz; Alvaro Enrique García; Javier Bajo; Gabriel Villarubia; Juan M Corchado
Journal:  Comput Intell Neurosci       Date:  2016-01-14
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.