Literature DB >> 8960842

Hypertension in Diabetes Study IV. Therapeutic requirements to maintain tight blood pressure control.

.   

Abstract

We report the efficacy of therapy over 5 years follow-up in 758 non-insulin-dependent diabetic patients in a prospective, randomised controlled study of therapy of mild hypertension. Patients were recruited who on antihypertensive therapy had systolic blood pressure over 150 mmHg or diastolic over 85 mmHg, or if not on therapy had systolic blood pressure over 160 mmHg or diastolic over 90 mmHg. Their mean blood pressure at entry to the study was 160/94 mmHg at a mean age of 57 years. They were allocated to tight control (aiming for systolic < 150/diastolic < 85 mmHg) or to less tight control (aiming for systolic < 180/diastolic < 105 mmHg). The tight control group were allocated to primary therapy either with a beta blocker (atenolol) or with an antiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor (captopril), with addition of other agents as required. Over 5 years, the mean blood pressure in the tight control group was significantly lower (143/82 vs 154/88 mmHg, p < 0.001). No difference was seen between those allocated to atenolol or captopril. The proportion of patients requiring three or more antihypertensive therapies to maintain tight control in those allocated to atenolol or captopril increased from 16 and 15%, respectively at 2 years to 25 and 26%, respectively at 5 years, whereas in the less tight control group at 2 and 5 years only 5 and 7%, respectively required three or more therapies. There was no difference in the incidence of side effects or hypoglycaemic episodes between those allocated to atenolol or captopril, but those allocated to atenolol increased their body weight by a mean of 2.3 kg compared with 0.5 kg in those allocated to captopril (p < 0.01). Allocation to atenolol was also associated with small increases in triglyceride, and decreases in LDL and HDL cholesterol, which are of uncertain clinical relevance. The study is continuing to determine whether the improved blood pressure control, which was obtained, will be beneficial in maintaining the health of patients by decreasing the incidence of major clinical complications, principally myocardial infarction and strokes, and microvascular complications, such as severe retinopathy requiring photocoagulation and deterioration of renal function.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8960842     DOI: 10.1007/s001250050614

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabetologia        ISSN: 0012-186X            Impact factor:   10.122


  9 in total

1.  Patients' Future Expectations for Diabetes and Hypertension Treatments: "Through the Diet… I Think This is Going to Go Away."

Authors:  Paige C Fairchild; Aviva G Nathan; Michael Quinn; Elbert S Huang; Neda Laiteerapong
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2016-10-11       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 2.  Blood pressure control for diabetic retinopathy.

Authors:  Diana V Do; Xue Wang; Satyanarayana S Vedula; Michael Marrone; Gina Sleilati; Barbara S Hawkins; Robert N Frank
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-01-31

3.  Risk factors for coronary artery disease in non-insulin dependent diabetes mellitus: United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS: 23)

Authors:  R C Turner; H Millns; H A Neil; I M Stratton; S E Manley; D R Matthews; R R Holman
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-03-14

Review 4.  Eprosartan: a review of its use in the management of hypertension.

Authors:  G L Plosker; R H Foster
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 5.  Understanding the quality chasm for hypertension control in diabetes: a structured review of "co-maneuvers" used in clinical trials.

Authors:  Aanand D Naik; Tim T Issac; Richard L Street; Mark E Kunik
Journal:  J Am Board Fam Med       Date:  2007 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.657

6.  Attempted forced titration of blood pressure to <130/85 mm Hg in type 2 diabetic hypertensive patients in clinical practice: the diastolic cost.

Authors:  Esther Osher; Yona Greenman; Karen Tordjman; Eldad Kisch; Galina Shenkerman; Michael Koffler; Itzhak Shapira; Naftali Stern
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 3.738

7.  Benefits of tight blood pressure control in diabetic patients with hypertension: importance of early and sustained implementation of effective treatment strategies.

Authors:  Gianfranco Parati; Grzegorz Bilo; Juan E Ochoa
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 19.112

8.  Blood pressure targets in adults with hypertension.

Authors:  Jose Agustin Arguedas; Viriam Leiva; James M Wright
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2020-12-17

9.  Association between antihypertensive treatment and adverse events: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ali Albasri; Miriam Hattle; Constantinos Koshiaris; Anna Dunnigan; Ben Paxton; Sarah Emma Fox; Margaret Smith; Lucinda Archer; Brooke Levis; Rupert A Payne; Richard D Riley; Nia Roberts; Kym I E Snell; Sarah Lay-Flurrie; Juliet Usher-Smith; Richard Stevens; F D Richard Hobbs; Richard J McManus; James P Sheppard
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2021-02-10
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.