Literature DB >> 8959768

Predicting in-hospital mortality during cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

S C Schultz1, D C Cullinane, M D Pasquale, C Magnant, S R Evans.   

Abstract

On the average, 10-15% of patients who undergo cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) following a cardiopulmonary arrest in the hospital environment will survive to be discharged. The purpose of this study was to determine objective factors influencing patient outcome after CPR to determine who should be resuscitated and when to end CPR efforts. The records of 266 patients who underwent in-hospital CPR over a 3-year period were retrospectively analyzed with regard to age, gender, co-morbid conditions, setting of arrest, duration of resuscitation, initial pH and PO2 during resuscitation, and outcome of resuscitative efforts. Twenty-four (9%) patients survived to be discharged from hospital. Eighty-seven (33%) patients arrested in the intensive care unit, 77 (29%) on the ward, 91 (34%) in the emergency room, six (2%) in the cardiac catheterization laboratory and five (2%) in the operating room. There was no significant difference in survival based on location of arrest. Factors associated with a poor prognosis included age greater than 60, co-morbid disease (i.e. pneumonia, sepsis, renal failure, heart disease, etc.), an initial PO2 < 50 mmHg and CPR efforts extending beyond 10 min. Based on this data, guidelines regarding initiation and termination of CPR should be instituted in light of poor outcome in patients over 60 years of age with co-morbid conditions, specifically after 10 min of CPR.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8959768     DOI: 10.1016/s0300-9572(96)00986-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Resuscitation        ISSN: 0300-9572            Impact factor:   5.262


  29 in total

1.  End-of-life decision making: a qualitative study of elderly individuals.

Authors:  K E Rosenfeld; N S Wenger; M Kagawa-Singer
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 2.  Early prediction of individual outcome following cardiopulmonary resuscitation: systematic review.

Authors:  P Kaye
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 2.740

Review 3.  Hospital do-not-resuscitate orders: why they have failed and how to fix them.

Authors:  Jacqueline K Yuen; M Carrington Reid; Michael D Fetters
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2011-02-01       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 4.  Bioethics for clinicians: 16. Dealing with demands for inappropriate treatment.

Authors:  C Weijer; P A Singer; B M Dickens; S Workman
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1998-10-06       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 5.  Post-anoxic vegetative state: imaging and prognostic perspectives.

Authors:  Mario Stanziano; Carolina Foglia; Andrea Soddu; Francesca Gargano; Michele Papa
Journal:  Funct Neurol       Date:  2011 Jan-Mar

Review 6.  [Lazarus phenomenon. Spontaneous return of circulation after cardiac arrest and cessation of resuscitation attempts].

Authors:  C H R Wiese; U E Bartels; S Orso; B M Graf
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 1.041

Review 7.  Using risk prediction tools in survivors of in-hospital cardiac arrest.

Authors:  Saket Girotra; Brahmajee K Nallamothu; Paul S Chan
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 2.931

8.  Resuscitation Predictor Scoring Scale for inhospital cardiac arrests.

Authors:  S Cooper; C Evans
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 2.740

9.  Patient knowledge and physician predictions of treatment preferences after discussion of advance directives.

Authors:  G S Fischer; J A Tulsky; M R Rose; L A Siminoff; R M Arnold
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 5.128

10.  Usefulness of the bispectral index during cardiopulmonary resuscitation -A case report-.

Authors:  Jin Yong Jung; Yeonbaek Kim; Jung-Eun Kim
Journal:  Korean J Anesthesiol       Date:  2013-01-21
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.