Literature DB >> 8957906

A survey of failure modes in composite resin restorations.

W D Browning1, J B Dennison.   

Abstract

This study was undertaken as a first step in identifying opportunities to decrease the need for replacement of class 3, 4, and 5 composite resin restorations. Data regarding the reasons for original placement or replacement of a restoration, the age of restorations at the time of replacement, and patient/doctor factors that may be associated with a decision to place or replace a restoration were recorded by use of a cross-sectional survey. During a 2-week period 108 dentists recorded reasons for placing or replacing 1360 restorations. Of the 1360 restorations, 42.8% were classified as primary placement and 57.2% as replacement restorations. Of the primary placements 80% were categorized as being due to caries; 9.1% fracture of tooth; 8.4% other (erosion lesions were specified 94% of the time). By class, caries was the dominant cause for class 3 (96.2%); caries and other (erosion) for class 5 (77.3% and 16.4%); fracture of tooth and caries (48.9% and 40.2%) for class 4 restorations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8957906

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oper Dent        ISSN: 0361-7734            Impact factor:   2.440


  8 in total

1.  Effect of three surface conditioning methods to improve bond strength of particulate filler resin composites.

Authors:  M Ozcan; P Alander; P K Vallittu; M-C Huysmans; W Kalk
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 3.896

2.  Characteristics, detection methods and treatment of questionable occlusal carious lesions: findings from the national dental practice-based research network.

Authors:  S K Makhija; G H Gilbert; E Funkhouser; J D Bader; V V Gordan; D B Rindal; D J Pihlstrom; V Qvist
Journal:  Caries Res       Date:  2014-01-29       Impact factor: 4.056

3.  Fracture frequency and longevity of fractured resin composite, polyacid-modified resin composite, and resin-modified glass ionomer cement class IV restorations: an up to 14 years of follow-up.

Authors:  Jan W V van Dijken; Ulla Pallesen
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2009-06-06       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  Reasons for Retreatment of Amalgam and Composite Restorations among the Patients Referring to Tabriz Faculty of Dentistry.

Authors:  Soodabeh Kimyai; Masomeh Mehdipour; Siavash Savadi Oskoee; Parnian Alizadeh Oskoee; Armin Abbaszadeh
Journal:  J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects       Date:  2007-06-10

5.  A comparative evaluation of dentinal hypersensitivity and microleakage associated with composite restorations in cavities preconditioned with air abrasion - An ex vivo study.

Authors:  Ankit Arora; Shashi Rashmi Acharya; Saraswathi M Vidya; Padmaja Sharma
Journal:  Contemp Clin Dent       Date:  2012-07

6.  Comparison of Microleakage of Glass Ionomer Restoration in Primary Teeth Prepared by Er: YAG Laser and the Conventional Method.

Authors:  M Ghandehari; G Mighani; S Shahabi; N Chiniforush; Z Shirmohammadi
Journal:  J Dent (Tehran)       Date:  2012-09-30

7.  Drug self-assembly for synthesis of highly-loaded antimicrobial drug-silica particles.

Authors:  Cameron A Stewart; Yoav Finer; Benjamin D Hatton
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-01-17       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Influence of Different Composites and Polishing Techniques on Periodontal Tissues near Noncarious Cervical Lesions: A Controlled, Randomized, Blinded Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Nancielli Teixeira; Mariana Benedetti Ferreira Webber; Carlos Augusto Nassar; Veridiana Camilotti; Marcio José Mendonça; Mario Alexandre Coelho Sinhoreti
Journal:  Eur J Dent       Date:  2019-12-31
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.