Literature DB >> 8957784

Nasal defects and osseointegrated implants: UCLA experience.

R D Nishimura1, E Roumanas, P K Moy, T Sugai.   

Abstract

A clinical study of 23 craniofacial implants placed in 11 nasal defects was conducted over a 7-year period. Implant-retained nasal prostheses were fabricated, implant success rate was determined, and the soft tissue responses were recorded at 6-month intervals. No data were gathered on two implants because of patient death. The implant success rate was 71.4% (15/21) but varied significantly by anatomic site. The implant success rate in the glabella was 0% (0/4), whereas the success rate in the anterior nasal floor was 88.1% (15/17). All implant failures occurred within the first year of loading. A five-point scale was used to record the health of the peri-implant soft tissues, and the patients were followed up from 6 to 74 months. The unit of measure was a visit/site, and a unit was assigned for each instance an implant site was evaluated. Evaluations were conducted at 6-month intervals for a total of 76 visit/sites for the study period. The results revealed that 85.5% (65/76) of the visit/sites demonstrated an absence of inflammation; 10.5% (8/76) of the visit/sites demonstrated slight redness; 1.3% (1/76) demonstrated peri-implant red and moist tissues; 2.6% (2/76) demonstrated granulation tissue associated with the implants; and 0% (0/76) demonstrated infection of the peri-implant soft tissues. Severe soft tissue reactions around implants placed in the anterior nasal floor are rare.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8957784     DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3913(96)90436-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Prosthet Dent        ISSN: 0022-3913            Impact factor:   3.426


  8 in total

1.  A novel method for retention of an orbital prosthesis in a case with continuous maxillary and orbital defect.

Authors:  Gunjan Pruthi; Veena Jain; Swati Sikka
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2010-12-08

2.  Nasal prosthesis rehabilitation: a case report.

Authors:  S Jain; K Maru; J Shukla; A Vyas; R Pillai; P Jain
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2011-08-18

3.  Rehabilitation of a complex midfacial defect by means of a zygoma-implant-supported prosthesis and nasal epithesis: a novel technique.

Authors:  Lorenzo Trevisiol; Pasquale Procacci; Antonio D'Agostino; Francesca Ferrari; Daniele De Santis; Pier Francesco Nocini
Journal:  Int J Implant Dent       Date:  2016-04-01

4.  Rehabilitation of Nose following Chemical Burn Using CAD/CAM Made Substructure for Implant Retained Nasal Prosthesis: A Clinical Report.

Authors:  Saurabh Chaturvedi; Tushar Bhagat; A K Verma; Vishwanath Gurumurthy; Mariyam Ali; Preeti Vadhwani; Mudita Chaturvedi
Journal:  Case Rep Dent       Date:  2017-06-18

5.  Prosthodontic rehabilitation of combined oronasal defect in patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma using two different attachments: Two case reports.

Authors:  Kirti Bansal; Paras Rawat; Gunjan Pruthi; Veena Jain
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2018 Oct-Dec

6.  Prosthetic rehabilitation of the geriatric oncologic rhinectomy patient utilizing a craniofacial implant-retained nasal prosthesis.

Authors:  Evan B Rosen; Zain Uddin Ahmed; Joseph M Huryn; Ian Ganly
Journal:  Clin Case Rep       Date:  2019-12-26

Review 7.  Systematic Review of Clinical Applications of CAD/CAM Technology for Craniofacial Implants Placement and Manufacturing of Nasal Prostheses.

Authors:  Waqas Tanveer; Angela Ridwan-Pramana; Pedro Molinero-Mourelle; Jan Harm Koolstra; Tymour Forouzanfar
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-04-03       Impact factor: 3.390

8.  Rehabilitation of orbital cavity after orbital exenteration using polymethyl methacrylate orbital prosthesis.

Authors:  Sumeet Jain; Parul Jain
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2016 Jan-Mar
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.