Literature DB >> 8957344

National survey of hospital-based pharmacokinetic services.

J E Murphy1, M K Slack, S Campbell.   

Abstract

The status of pharmacokinetic services in the nation's hospitals was studied. A questionnaire was mailed in February 1995 to all 252 respondents to ASHP's 1994 national survey of hospital-based pharmaceutical services who indicated the provision of pharmacokinetic services in their institution. Ninety-eight completed questionnaires were returned (40.2% response rate). The pharmacokinetic services provided required an average of 19.1 person-hours per week, tended to be provided by staff pharmacists, were managed by the pharmacy department, tended to be most focused on aminoglycosides and vancomycin, required an average of 60 notes in patient charts per month, and relied on both computers and calculators for deriving values. There was little contact with patients during the consultation process. Drug concentration measurements tended to be scheduled by service providers, but confidence in the accuracy of the timing of dose administration and blood sampling was limited. Respondents believed that the services tended to be supported by other hospital personnel and that they were successful. There was very little expectation that the workload for providing pharmacokinetic services would increase in the near future. A national survey of hospital-based pharmacokinetic services showed that it took 19 hours per week on average to provide the services, that the focus was on aminoglycosides and vancomycin, and that the services were perceived to be supported by other departments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8957344     DOI: 10.1093/ajhp/53.23.2840

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Health Syst Pharm        ISSN: 1079-2082            Impact factor:   2.637


  7 in total

Review 1.  Therapeutic drug monitoring: do the improved outcomes justify the costs?

Authors:  G E Schumacher; J T Barr
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 6.447

2.  Clinical pharmacokinetics: perceptions of hospital pharmacists in Qatar about how it was taught and how it is applied.

Authors:  Nadir Kheir; Ahmed Awaisu; Hoda Gad; Shereen Elazzazy; Farah Jibril; Mawadda Gajam
Journal:  Int J Clin Pharm       Date:  2015-09-04

3.  A survey of therapeutic drug monitoring services in Malaysia.

Authors:  Ab Fatah Ab Rahman; Hisham Elhag Ahmed Abdelrahim; Mohamed Izham Mohamed Ibrahim
Journal:  Saudi Pharm J       Date:  2012-01-14       Impact factor: 4.330

Review 4.  Pharmacoeconomics and therapeutic drug monitoring.

Authors:  J L Bootman; D L Harrison
Journal:  Pharm World Sci       Date:  1997-08

Review 5.  Benchmarking therapeutic drug monitoring software: a review of available computer tools.

Authors:  Aline Fuchs; Chantal Csajka; Yann Thoma; Thierry Buclin; Nicolas Widmer
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 6.  Clinical pharmacokinetics in the 21st century. Does the evidence support definitive outcomes?

Authors:  M H Ensom; G A Davis; C D Cropp; R J Ensom
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 6.447

7.  Survey of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring Practices in Pediatric Health Care Programs across Canada.

Authors:  Donna Leung; Mary H H Ensom; Roxane Carr
Journal:  Can J Hosp Pharm       Date:  2018-04-30
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.