Literature DB >> 8956961

Functional results after abdominal suture rectopexy for rectal prolapse or intussusception.

W Graf1, U Karlbom, L Påhlman, S Nilsson, S Ejerblad.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the functional outcome after suture rectopexy in patients with rectal prolapse or intussusception.
DESIGN: Retrospective study.
SETTING: University hospital, Sweden.
SUBJECTS: 33 patients with rectal prolapse and 19 patients with intussusception treated by abdominal suture rectopexy 1969-1992. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Bowel function evaluated by a questionnaire a median of 97 months after operation.
RESULTS: 10/33 patients (30%) reported less constipation after rectopexy in the prolapse group compared with 3/19 (16%) in the intussusception group (p = 0.33). Rectal emptying improved in 14/33 (42%) and 1/19 (5%), respectively (p = 0.005), and incontinence in 12/33 (36%) and 3/19 (16%), respectively (p = 0.20). Seventeen patients (52%) with prolapse and 3 (16%) with intussusception described the result of operation as excellent or good (p = 0.02).
CONCLUSION: There is a reasonable chance of improved rectal emptying and continence in patients undergoing suture rectopexy for rectal prolapse, whereas bowel symptoms commonly worsen postoperatively in patients treated for intussusception.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8956961

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Surg        ISSN: 1102-4151


  27 in total

1.  Rectal prolapse: which surgical option is appropriate?

Authors:  T H K Schiedeck; O Schwandner; J Scheele; S Farke; H-P Bruch
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2004-03-05       Impact factor: 3.445

Review 2.  Focus on abdominal rectopexy for full-thickness rectal prolapse: meta-analysis of literature.

Authors:  F Cadeddu; P Sileri; M Grande; E De Luca; L Franceschilli; G Milito
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2011-12-15       Impact factor: 3.781

3.  Rectal prolapse.

Authors:  Scott D Goldstein; Pinckney J Maxwell
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2011-03

4.  Long-term results of stapled transanal rectal resection (STARR) for obstructive defecation syndrome.

Authors:  Andreas Ommer; Thomas M Rolfs; Martin K Walz
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2010-08-19       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Stapled transanal resection of the rectum (STARR) for the obstructed defaecation syndrome.

Authors:  Ridzuan Farouk; R Bhardwaj; R K S Phillips
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 1.891

6.  Comparison of abdominal and perineal procedures for complete rectal prolapse: an analysis of 104 patients.

Authors:  Jong Lyul Lee; Sung Soo Yang; In Ja Park; Chang Sik Yu; Jin Cheon Kim
Journal:  Ann Surg Treat Res       Date:  2014-04-24       Impact factor: 1.859

7.  Functional disorders: rectoanal intussusception.

Authors:  Eric G Weiss; Elisabeth C McLemore
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2008-05

8.  Abdominal approaches for rectal prolapse.

Authors:  Bashar Safar; Anthony M Vernava
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2008-05

9.  Comment on: Stapled transanal resection of the rectum (STARR) for obstructed defaecation syndrome.

Authors:  C Harmston; O M Jones; C Cunningham; I Lindsey
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 1.891

10.  Treatment of obstructed defecation.

Authors:  C Neal Ellis
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2005-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.