Literature DB >> 8956933

Modern electronic and chemical thermometers used in the axilla are inaccurate.

S T Zengeya1, I Blumenthal.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Rectal and axillary temperatures were measured simultaneously in 83 children using three different thermometer devices providing 166 pairs of results. In the first series consisting of 22 febrile children (44 measurements) and 20 afebrile children (40 measurements), the rectal mercury measurement was compared to an axillary mercury and axillary Tempa-DOT thermometer. The axillary mercury had sensitivity of 14/22 (64%) and specificity of 20/20 (100%) while the Tempa-DOT had sensitivity of 15/22 (68%) and specificity of 19/20 (95%). In the second series comprising 21 febrile children (42 measurements) and 20 afebrile children (40 measurements) the axillary mercury had sensitivity of 11/21 (52%) and specificity of 20/20 (100%) while the electronic thermometer had sensitivity of 10/21 (48%) and specificity of 20/20 (100%). Regardless of the thermometer used, the axilla is a poor alternative to rectal measurements in the diagnosis of fever.
CONCLUSION: Mercury-free thermometers, when used in the axilla are as poor alternatives to rectal measurements as mercury-in-glass thermometers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8956933     DOI: 10.1007/bf02532519

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Pediatr        ISSN: 0340-6199            Impact factor:   3.183


  10 in total

1.  Which thermometer?

Authors:  I Blumenthal
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1991-06-15       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Site selection in taking body temperature.

Authors:  C G Blainey
Journal:  Am J Nurs       Date:  1974-10       Impact factor: 2.220

3.  Axillary temperature as a screening test for fever in children.

Authors:  M J Kresch
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  1984-04       Impact factor: 4.406

4.  Chemical and glass thermometers for axillary temperatures: how do they compare?

Authors:  D Payne; A Johnson; S McKenzie; M Rogers
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 3.791

5.  Fever: the old and the new.

Authors:  E Atkins
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  1984-03       Impact factor: 5.226

6.  Bacteriologic studies on electronic hospital thermometers.

Authors:  L Smith; H N Prince; E Johnson
Journal:  Infect Control       Date:  1981 Jul-Aug

7.  Thermometers and rectal perforations in the neonate.

Authors:  J D Frank; S Brown
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1978-10       Impact factor: 3.791

8.  The inaccuracy of axillary temperatures measured with an electronic thermometer.

Authors:  J M Ogren
Journal:  Am J Dis Child       Date:  1990-01

9.  Axillary and rectal temperature measurements in infants.

Authors:  C J Morley; P H Hewson; A J Thornton; T J Cole
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 3.791

10.  Should we ban the mercury thermometer? Discussion paper.

Authors:  I Blumenthal
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 18.000

  10 in total
  2 in total

1.  Body temperature measurement in paediatrics: Which gadget should we believe?

Authors:  Joan L Robinson
Journal:  Paediatr Child Health       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 2.253

2.  Differences in rectal temperatures measured at depths of 4-19 cm from the anal sphincter during exercise and rest.

Authors:  Joo-Young Lee; Hitoshi Wakabayashi; Titis Wijayanto; Yutaka Tochihara
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2009-09-29       Impact factor: 3.078

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.