Literature DB >> 8953484

An in vivo quantitative analysis of the fit of Nobel Biocare implant superstructures.

P D Cheshire1, J A Hobkirk.   

Abstract

Loss of osseointegration of implant fixtures and mechanical failure of superstructures have been attributed to failure to achieve a passive fit between the superstructure and the transmucosal abutment (TMA). The fit of five mandibular superstructures, fabricated on Nobel Biocare implants, was investigated in vivo, using a polyvinyl siloxane impression material to record the discrepancies. Following sectioning of the impressions, the vertical and horizontal discrepancies were analysed at four locations using a travelling microscope. The discrepancies obtained were measured both when the gold cylinder screws were maximally tightened by hand and when tightened with a torque driver to the recommended value of 10 Ncm. The vertical discrepancies for the hand tightened abutments ranged from 0 micron to 63 microns with a mean of 14 microns. In the mechanically tightened group, the vertical discrepancies ranged from 0 micron to 130 microns with a mean of 21 microns. The horizontal discrepancies for the mechanically tightened abutments ranged from 0 micron to 140 microns with a mean of 31 microns, compared with a mean of 46 microns and range of 0 micron to 113 microns, for the hand-tightened abutments. A close fit was seldom achieved. It is concluded that considerable discrepancies existed around superstructures that had been judged to have a clinically acceptable fit. These were reduced in the vertical direction by hand tightening of the gold screws.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8953484     DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2842.1996.d01-193.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oral Rehabil        ISSN: 0305-182X            Impact factor:   3.837


  2 in total

1.  Evaluation of impression accuracy for a four-implant mandibular model--a digital approach.

Authors:  Michael Stimmelmayr; Kurt Erdelt; Jan-Frederik Güth; Arndt Happe; Florian Beuer
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2011-10-19       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Clinical study evaluating the discrepancy of two different impression techniques of four implants in an edentulous jaw.

Authors:  Michael Stimmelmayr; Jan-Frederik Güth; Kurt Erdelt; Arndt Happe; Markus Schlee; Florian Beuer
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2012-12-06       Impact factor: 3.573

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.