BACKGROUND: Hodgkin's disease (HD) after the age of 65 years is uncommon and there are no published data on chemotherapy regimens devised for elderly HD patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From 1990 to 1993, 25 elderly HD patients were treated with the CVP/CEB regimen: chlorambucil 6 mg/sqm p.o. days 1 through 7, vinblastine 6 mg/sqm i.v. on day 1, procarbazine 100 mg/sqm p.o. days 1 through 7, prednisone 30 mg/sqm p.o. days 1 through 7, cyclophosphamide 500 mg./sqm i.v. day 15, etoposide 70 mg/sqm i.v. day 15, bleomycin 10 mg/sqm i.v. day 15. Each course was repeated every 4 weeks. Stage I and II patients were treated with 3 courses followed by involved field radiotherapy, while more advanced stage patients received 6 courses and radiotherapy was limited to bulky areas. The results of the CVP/CEB regimen are retrospectively compared to those of 74 elderly patients treated between 1982 and 1989 and subdivided into the following 2 groups: 32 patients treated according to the same therapy used at that time in younger patients, and 42 patients given alternative low aggressivity or palliative treatment. RESULTS: CVP/CEB is a well-tolerated regimen, with only 1 (4%) toxic death and 2 (8%) protocol violations/interruptions. The CVP/CEB complete remission rate (73%) compares favorably with our previous groups of patients, mainly because of the lower toxic death rate. However, the CVP/CEB relapse-free survival rate is lower than that of patients treated with more aggressive conventional regimens (47% vs. 77%, p < 0.02). The CVP/CEB overall survival and event-free survival rates are 55% and 32%, respectively, and they are not statistically different from those of patients treated before 1990. CONCLUSIONS: CVP/CEB is a well-tolerated low toxicity regimen with a high CR rate. The relapse rate is high and event-free survival is comparable to that of patients treated conventionally. Our results suggest the need for individualized treatment criteria for older patients with HD.
BACKGROUND:Hodgkin's disease (HD) after the age of 65 years is uncommon and there are no published data on chemotherapy regimens devised for elderly HDpatients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From 1990 to 1993, 25 elderly HDpatients were treated with the CVP/CEB regimen: chlorambucil 6 mg/sqm p.o. days 1 through 7, vinblastine 6 mg/sqm i.v. on day 1, procarbazine 100 mg/sqm p.o. days 1 through 7, prednisone 30 mg/sqm p.o. days 1 through 7, cyclophosphamide 500 mg./sqm i.v. day 15, etoposide 70 mg/sqm i.v. day 15, bleomycin 10 mg/sqm i.v. day 15. Each course was repeated every 4 weeks. Stage I and II patients were treated with 3 courses followed by involved field radiotherapy, while more advanced stage patients received 6 courses and radiotherapy was limited to bulky areas. The results of the CVP/CEB regimen are retrospectively compared to those of 74 elderly patients treated between 1982 and 1989 and subdivided into the following 2 groups: 32 patients treated according to the same therapy used at that time in younger patients, and 42 patients given alternative low aggressivity or palliative treatment. RESULTS: CVP/CEB is a well-tolerated regimen, with only 1 (4%) toxic death and 2 (8%) protocol violations/interruptions. The CVP/CEB complete remission rate (73%) compares favorably with our previous groups of patients, mainly because of the lower toxic death rate. However, the CVP/CEB relapse-free survival rate is lower than that of patients treated with more aggressive conventional regimens (47% vs. 77%, p < 0.02). The CVP/CEB overall survival and event-free survival rates are 55% and 32%, respectively, and they are not statistically different from those of patients treated before 1990. CONCLUSIONS: CVP/CEB is a well-tolerated low toxicity regimen with a high CR rate. The relapse rate is high and event-free survival is comparable to that of patients treated conventionally. Our results suggest the need for individualized treatment criteria for older patients with HD.
Authors: Andrew M Evens; Fangxin Hong; Leo I Gordon; Richard I Fisher; Nancy L Bartlett; Joseph M Connors; Randy D Gascoyne; Henry Wagner; Mary Gospodarowicz; Bruce D Cheson; Patrick J Stiff; Ranjana Advani; Thomas P Miller; Richard T Hoppe; Brad S Kahl; Sandra J Horning Journal: Br J Haematol Date: 2013-01-29 Impact factor: 6.998