Literature DB >> 8951544

Inhalation injury severity scoring system: a quantitative method.

D L Brown1, S B Archer, D G Greenhalgh, M A Washam, L E James, G D Warden.   

Abstract

Inhalation injury, a major contributor to burn-related mortality, has been difficult to quantify. A scoring system paralleling current adult respiratory distress syndrome systems has the potential to distinguish survivors from nonsurvivors. The utility of the PaO2/FiO2 (P/F) ratio in predicting injury severity was first examined. In a review of 120 patients with inhalation injury, those with P/F ratios greater than or equal to 300 after resuscitation were more likely to survive than those with ratios less than 300. The P/F ratio had no value when obtained before resuscitation. Next, a scoring system was developed to assist in comparing the severity of injury in ventilator-dependent patients with burns. Measurements were recorded prospectively in four categories: chest x-ray evaluation, P/F ratio, peak inspiratory pressure, and bronchoscopy. When comparing survivors (20) versus nonsurvivors (6), significant differences were found early (day 0, day 1, and week 1) for P/F ratio and overall severity score. Differences were seen later (week 1 and week 2) for chest x-ray evaluation and peak inspiratory pressure values. Because of low numbers the value of bronchoscopy could not be evaluated. The role of an inhalation injury severity scoring system for predicting survival should be examined in larger prospective trials.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8951544     DOI: 10.1097/00004630-199611000-00013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Burn Care Rehabil        ISSN: 0273-8481


  5 in total

1.  Investigation of relationship between inhalation injury assessment and prognosis in burn patients.

Authors:  Hyeong Tae Yang; Haejun Yim; Young Suk Cho; Dohern Kim; Jun Hur; Wook Chun; Jong Hyun Kim; So Young Jung; Byung Chun Kim; Jae Jung Lee
Journal:  J Korean Surg Soc       Date:  2011-07-11

2.  The role of futility judgments in improperly limiting the scope of clinical research.

Authors:  W Harper
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 2.903

3.  Pathophysiology, management and treatment of smoke inhalation injury.

Authors:  Sebastian Rehberg; Marc O Maybauer; Perenlei Enkhbaatar; Dirk M Maybauer; Yusuke Yamamoto; Daniel L Traber
Journal:  Expert Rev Respir Med       Date:  2009-06-01       Impact factor: 3.772

Review 4.  Pathophysiology, research challenges, and clinical management of smoke inhalation injury.

Authors:  Perenlei Enkhbaatar; Basil A Pruitt; Oscar Suman; Ronald Mlcak; Steven E Wolf; Hiroyuki Sakurai; David N Herndon
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2016-10-01       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 5.  Inhalation injury: epidemiology, pathology, treatment strategies.

Authors:  David J Dries; Frederick W Endorf
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2013-04-19       Impact factor: 2.953

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.