Literature DB >> 8951188

Single and multiple dose pharmacokinetics of nefazodone in subjects classified as extensive and poor metabolizers of dextromethorphan.

R H Barbhaiya1, A B Buch, D S Greene.   

Abstract

1. The single and multiple dose pharmacokinetics of nefazodone (NEF) and its active metabolites hydroxynefazodone (HO-NEF) and m-chlorophenyl-piperazine (mCPP) were evaluated in subjects classified as extensive metabolizers (EM) or poor metabolizers (PM) of dextromethorphan. 2. In a parallel design study, 10 subjects from each phenotype received either 50 mg or 200 mg oral doses of NEF as single doses on Day 1 and multiple (twice daily) doses on Days 12-22. 3. Serial plasma and urine samples were collected at specified time intervals after dosing on Days 1, 16, 18, 20 and 22. Plasma samples were analyzed for NEF, HO-NEF and mCPP. Urine samples were analyzed for mCPP and its metabolite p-hydroxy-mCPP (p-HO-mCPP) before and after hydrolyzing the samples with beta-glucuronidase. 4. For the 200 mg dose group, the single dose plasma results showed no significant differences in pharmacokinetic parameters for NEF and HO-NEF in EM compared with PM subjects. However, for mCPP, Cmax was 89 ng ml-1 in the PM subjects compared with 44 ng ml-1 in the EM subjects, AUC was higher in the PM than EM subjects (1642 ng ml-1 h and 412 ng ml-1 h, respectively), and mCPP elimination half-life increased from 6.1 h in the EM subjects to 16.4 h in the PM subjects. Upon multiple dosing, plasma levels for NEF and all metabolites reached steady state within 3 days of dosing in both groups of subjects. Steady state pharmacokinetic parameters for NEF and HO-NEF in EM and PM subjects were not significantly different. The steady state Cmax and AUC values for mCPP in the PM subjects were 182 ng ml-1 and 1706 ng ml-1 h, respectively, compared with 49.6 ng ml-1 and 182 ng ml-1 h in the EM subjects. 5. The cumulative urinary excretion of mCPP and p-HO-mCPP was different for EM and PM subjects. Excretion of total mCPP and total p-HO-mCPP was approximately four-fold lower and five-fold higher, respectively, in the EM subjects than PM subjects. 6. These results indicate that the conversion of mCPP to p-HO-mCPP is attributable to metabolism by cytochrome P450 2D6. The differences in mCPP pharmacokinetic parameters in PM subjects did not affect the time required for NEF and its metabolites to attain steady state or the number of adverse experiences in either group of subjects. Based on the results of this study, NEF may be dosed to EM and PM patients without regard to their cytochrome P450 2D6 phenotype.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8951188     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.1996.tb00112.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol        ISSN: 0306-5251            Impact factor:   4.335


  11 in total

Review 1.  Metabolism of some "second"- and "fourth"-generation antidepressants: iprindole, viloxazine, bupropion, mianserin, maprotiline, trazodone, nefazodone, and venlafaxine.

Authors:  S Rotzinger; M Bourin; Y Akimoto; R T Coutts; G B Baker
Journal:  Cell Mol Neurobiol       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 5.046

2.  Acute liver failure after treatment with nefazodone.

Authors:  M I Lucena; R J Andrade; A Gomez-Outes; M Rubio; M R Cabello
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 3.  Polymorphic cytochromes P450 and drugs used in psychiatry.

Authors:  R T Coutts; L J Urichuk
Journal:  Cell Mol Neurobiol       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 5.046

Review 4.  Clinical pharmacokinetics of nefazodone.

Authors:  D S Greene; R H Barbhaiya
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 5.  The impact of the CYP2D6-polymorphism on dose recommendations for current antidepressants.

Authors:  Norbert Thuerauf; Jens Lunkenheimer
Journal:  Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 5.270

Review 6.  Metabolism of the newer antidepressants. An overview of the pharmacological and pharmacokinetic implications.

Authors:  S Caccia
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 6.447

7.  Comparative effects of continuous infusion of mCPP, Ro 60-0175 and d-fenfluramine on food intake, water intake, body weight and locomotor activity in rats.

Authors:  S P Vickers; K R Benwell; R H Porter; M J Bickerdike; G A Kennett; C T Dourish
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 8.739

8.  Terfenadine-antidepressant interactions: an in vitro inhibition study using human liver microsomes.

Authors:  M Jurima-Romet; M Wright; S Neigh
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 9.  Treatment of anxiety and depression in transplant patients: pharmacokinetic considerations.

Authors:  Catherine C Crone; Geoffrey M Gabriel
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 10.  Choosing appropriate antidepressant therapy in the elderly. A risk-benefit assessment of available agents.

Authors:  A J Flint
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 3.923

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.