Literature DB >> 8949756

Clinical trials of neutron radiotherapy in the United States.

K L Lindsley1, P Cho, K J Stelzer, W J Koh, M Austin-Seymour, K J Russell, G E Laramore, T W Griffin.   

Abstract

The development of clinical neutron facilities in the 1980s, capable of delivering high energy neutrons spurred full scale phase III testing of neutron beam radiotherapy in a number of tumors including salivary gland, head and neck, prostate, and non small-cell lung cancer. The Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) and the Medical Research Council (MRC) jointly sponsored a randomized trial for the treatment of advanced stage salivary gland tumors comparing neutron to conventional photon and/or electron radiotherapy. Although no improvement in survival was seen, the study demonstrated a striking and statistically significant difference in the local-regional control of unresectable salivary gland tumors (56 vs 17%), favoring neutron beam irradiation. Subsequent clinical trials of neutron beam irradiation were initiated by the Neutron Therapy Collaborative Working Group (NTCWG) sponsored by the National Cancer Institute (NCI). A phase III trial comparing neutron to photon radiotherapy for inoperable regional non-small cell lung cancer showed no overall improvement in survival. However, a statistically significant improvement in survival was observed in the subset of patients with squamous cell histology. The NTCWG trial comparing fast-neutron therapy versus conventional photon irradiation in the treatment of advanced squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck showed a statistically significant improvement in initial complete response (70 vs 52%) favoring neutrons. However, subsequent failures erased any difference in ultimate local-regional control rates and survival curves were essentially the same in both arms. The randomized study of the NTCWG for locally advanced prostate cancer demonstrated a significant decrease in local-regional failure (11 vs 32%) at 5 years, favoring the neutron arm. Furthermore, biochemical measures of disease control also favored the neutron arm with prostate specific antigen (PSA) levels elevated in 17% of the neutron-treated patients compared to 45% of the photon-treated patients at 5 years. At the 5-year analysis, no significant difference in survival was observed between the two arms; however, longer follow-up is necessary to assess the ultimate impact of improved local-regional control on survival. An analysis of complications in this series revealed the importance of beam shaping and treatment planning capabilities in maintaining long-term sequelae following neutron irradiation at an acceptably low level.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8949756     DOI: 10.1016/0924-4212(96)84889-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bull Cancer Radiother        ISSN: 0924-4212


  4 in total

Review 1.  Prostate cancer: a comprehensive review.

Authors:  S N Pentyala; J Lee; K Hsieh; W C Waltzer; A Trocchia; L Musacchia; M J Rebecchi; S A Khan
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 3.064

2.  Assessment of the homogeneous efficacy of carbon ions in the spread-out Bragg peak for human lung cancer cell lines.

Authors:  Yasuo Takiguchi; Tadaaki Miyamoto; Keiichi Nagao; Takayuki Kuriyama
Journal:  Radiat Med       Date:  2007-07-27

3.  Delayed cerebral radiation necrosis after neutron beam radiation of a parotid adenocarcinoma: a case report and review of the literature.

Authors:  Christopher S Hong; Hamza N Gokozan; José J Otero; Michael Guiou; J Bradley Elder
Journal:  Case Rep Neurol Med       Date:  2014-09-30

Review 4.  Fast and Furious: Fast Neutron Therapy in Cancer Treatment.

Authors:  Konstantin Gordon; Igor Gulidov; Timur Fatkhudinov; Sergey Koryakin; Andrey Kaprin
Journal:  Int J Part Ther       Date:  2022-08-05
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.