Literature DB >> 8947403

What best protects the inverted weightbearing ankle against further inversion? Evertor muscle strength compares favorably with shoe height, athletic tape, and three orthoses.

J A Ashton-Miller1, R A Ottaviani, C Hutchinson, E M Wojtys.   

Abstract

We measured the maximal isometric eversion moment developed under full weightbearing in 20 healthy adult men (age, 24.4 +/- 3.4 years; mean +/- SD) with their ankles in 15 degrees of inversion. Tests were performed at both 0 degree and 32 degrees of ankle plantar flexion in low- and in three-quarter-top shoes with and without adhesive athletic tape or one of three proprietary ankle orthoses. At 0 degree of ankle plantar flexion, the mean maximal voluntary resistance of the unprotected ankle to an inversion moment was 50 +/- 8 N-m; this increased by an average of 12% (or 6 N-m) when the subject wore a three-quarter-top basketball shoe. The maximal voluntary resistances to inversion moments developed with the ankles further protected by athletic tape or any of three orthoses were not significantly different. Biomechanical calculations suggest that at 15 degrees of inversion the fully active ankle evertor muscles isometrically developed a moment up to six times larger than that developed when an athlete wears a three-quarter-top shoe alone and more than three times larger than that developed passively when the athlete has tape or an orthosis worn inside a three-quarter-top shoe. We conclude that fully activated and strong ankle evertor muscles are the best protection for a near-maximally inverted ankle at footstrike.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8947403     DOI: 10.1177/036354659602400616

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Sports Med        ISSN: 0363-5465            Impact factor:   6.202


  35 in total

Review 1.  Functional instability following lateral ankle sprain.

Authors:  J Hertel
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 2.  Rehabilitation of ligamentous ankle injuries: a review of recent studies.

Authors:  C Zöch; V Fialka-Moser; M Quittan
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 13.800

3.  Biomechanical and Neuromuscular Effects of Ankle Taping and Bracing.

Authors:  Gary B Wilkerson
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 2.860

4.  The effect of an ankle brace on the 3-dimensional kinematics and tibio-talar contact condition for lateral ankle sprains.

Authors:  Go Omori; Kensaku Kawakami; Makoto Sakamoto; Toshiaki Hara; Yoshio Koga
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2004-03-18       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Load-dependent movement regulation of lateral stretch shortening cycle jumps.

Authors:  Jana Fleischmann; Dominic Gehring; Guillaume Mornieux; Albert Gollhofer
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2010-05-05       Impact factor: 3.078

6.  Effects of Preventative Ankle Taping on Planned Change-of-Direction and Reactive Agility Performance and Ankle Muscle Activity in Basketballers.

Authors:  Matthew D Jeffriess; Adrian B Schultz; Tye S McGann; Samuel J Callaghan; Robert G Lockie
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2015-11-24       Impact factor: 2.988

7.  Effects of high-top and low-top shoes on ankle inversion.

Authors:  M D Ricard; S S Schulties; J J Saret
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 2.860

Review 8.  Effect of sensorimotor training on morphological, neurophysiological and functional characteristics of the ankle: a critical review.

Authors:  Maarten D W Hupperets; Evert A L M Verhagen; Willem van Mechelen
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 11.136

9.  Functional Anatomy, Pathomechanics, and Pathophysiology of Lateral Ankle Instability.

Authors:  Jay Hertel
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 2.860

10.  Ankle bracing, fatigue, and time to stabilization in collegiate volleyball athletes.

Authors:  Megan Y Shaw; Phillip A Gribble; Jamie L Frye
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2008 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.860

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.