Literature DB >> 8946975

Are patients who undergo open-access endoscopy more anxious about their procedures than patients referred from the GI clinic?

R J Mahajan1, S Agrawal, J S Barthel, J B Marshall.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Our academic hospital center operates an open access endoscopy service that allows referring physicians to directly schedule patients for outpatient esophagogastroduodenoscopy and colonoscopy without having them first seen in the GI clinic. Although patients from the GI clinic have an opportunity to meet the endoscopist and discuss their procedures directly beforehand, patients who are scheduled to undergo endoscopy through our open access service receive only a brief telephone call from a GI fellow or nurse that is made to screen for contraindications to the procedure and to give instructions. Our objective was to find out whether patients who used our open access service were more anxious about their procedures than those referred from the GI clinic.
METHODS: On arrival to our endoscopy center, consecutive patients from the open access service (n = 142) and the GI clinic (n = 85) completed a questionnaire that included three measures of anxiety. After completion of the endoscopic procedure, the attending endoscopist rated patient cooperation. Patients also completed a phone questionnaire on the day after their procedures assessing their experience with endoscopy.
RESULTS: We found no difference between patients from the open access service and those from the GI clinic in any of the measures of preprocedure anxiety, in scores measuring cooperation during procedures, or in patient ratings of their experience with endoscopy as assessed on the day after procedures.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients who used our open access service were no more anxious about their procedures or less cooperative during them than patients first seen in the GI clinic. In both groups, procedure-related anxiety was decreased in patients who had previously undergone endoscopy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8946975

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 0002-9270            Impact factor:   10.864


  7 in total

1.  Overcoming poor attendance to first scheduled colonoscopy: a randomized trial of peer coach or brochure support.

Authors:  Barbara J Turner; Mark Weiner; Sheila D Berry; Karen Lillie; Kevin Fosnocht; Christopher S Hollenbeak
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2007-11-21       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 2.  Colonoscopy, pain and fears: Is it an indissoluble trinomial?

Authors:  Lucio Trevisani; Angelo Zelante; Sergio Sartori
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2014-06-16

3.  Clinical outcomes associated with attempts to educate patients about lower endoscopy: a narrative review.

Authors:  John M Coombes; John F Steiner; David B Bekelman; Allan V Prochazka; Thomas D Denberg
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2008-06

4.  A comparison of open access endoscopy and hospital-referred endoscopy in a district general hospital.

Authors:  S D Johnston; J Kirby; E Mackle; T J Robinson
Journal:  Ulster Med J       Date:  1999-11

5.  Information seeking and anxiety among colonoscopy-naïve adults: Direct-to-colonoscopy vs traditional consult-first pathways.

Authors:  Jocelyn A Silvester; Harmandeep Kalkat; Lesley A Graff; John R Walker; Harminder Singh; Donald R Duerksen
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2016-11-16

6.  A novel intubation discomfort score to predict painful unsedated colonoscopy.

Authors:  Limei Wang; Hui Jia; Hui Luo; Xiaoyu Kang; Linhui Zhang; Xiangping Wang; Shaowei Yao; Qin Tao; Yanglin Pan; Xuegang Guo
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2021-03-12       Impact factor: 1.817

7.  Diversity of endoscopy center operations and practice variation across California's safety-net hospital system: a statewide survey.

Authors:  Lukejohn W Day; Taft Bhuket; John M Inadomi; Hal F Yee
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2013-06-15
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.