Literature DB >> 8946425

The effects of intra-amygdala infusion of the AMPA receptor antagonist CNQX on retention performance following aversive training.

M H Mesches1, M Bianchin, J L McGaugh.   

Abstract

The aim of these experiments was to determine whether impaired retention performance in aversively motivated tasks, induced by blockade of amygdala AMPA receptors, is due to influences on mechanisms underlying memory retrieval or to other influences on performance. Rats received either footshock escape training (1 or 10 trials), or no foot shock, in a two-compartment straight alley and bilateral intra-amygdala infusions of the AMPA receptor antagonist CNQX (0.5 microgram) were subsequently administered prior to inhibitory avoidance retention testing 8 days later. The CNQX impaired, but did not block, inhibitory avoidance retention performance as indicated by the initial latencies to enter the shock compartment. The animals were then retained in the alley until they remained in the starting compartment for 100 consecutive s and entries into the shock compartment were recorded as errors. In both the controls and CNQX-treated groups, increases in amount of original training resulted in fewer errors, indicating memory for the escape training. Furthermore, regardless of the amount of original training (i.e., 0, 1, or 10 trials), CNQX-treated groups made more errors. Other experiments examined intra-amygdala CNQX effects on reactivity to footshock, locomotor activity, and anxiety. CNQX decreased reactivity to footshock, blocked shock-induced decreases in locomotor activity, and had an anxiolytic effect in an elevated plus maze comparable to that induced by midazolam (0.5 microgram). These findings suggest that intra-amygdala infusions of CNQX prior to retention testing affect inhibitory avoidance retention performance following aversive training by altering locomotor activity, reducing sensitivity to footshock, and reducing anxiety. The implications of these findings for hypotheses concerning amygdala function in aversively motivated learning and memory is discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8946425     DOI: 10.1006/nlme.1996.0073

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem        ISSN: 1074-7427            Impact factor:   2.877


  6 in total

1.  Coantagonism of glutamate receptors and nicotinic acetylcholinergic receptors disrupts fear conditioning and latent inhibition of fear conditioning.

Authors:  Thomas J Gould; Michael C Lewis
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2005 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.460

2.  Basolateral amygdala is not critical for cognitive memory of contextual fear conditioning.

Authors:  A Vazdarjanova; J L McGaugh
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1998-12-08       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Effects of intra-accumbal administration of dopamine and ionotropic glutamate receptor drugs on delay discounting performance in rats.

Authors:  Justin R Yates; Michael T Bardo
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 1.912

4.  The hippocampus mediates glucocorticoid-induced impairment of spatial memory retrieval: dependence on the basolateral amygdala.

Authors:  Benno Roozendaal; Qyana K Griffith; Jason Buranday; Dominique J-F De Quervain; James L McGaugh
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-01-21       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Extended fear conditioning reveals a role for both N-methyl-D-aspartic acid and non-N-methyl-D-aspartic acid receptors in the amygdala in the acquisition of conditioned fear.

Authors:  P J Pistell; W A Falls
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2008-07-11       Impact factor: 3.590

6.  Chronic ethanol and withdrawal differentially modulate pre- and postsynaptic function at glutamatergic synapses in rat basolateral amygdala.

Authors:  Anna K Läck; Marvin R Diaz; Ann Chappell; Dustin W DuBois; Brian A McCool
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2007-09-26       Impact factor: 2.714

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.