Literature DB >> 8945670

The accuracy of magnetic resonance phase velocity measurements in stenotic flow.

J M Siegel1, J N Oshinski, R I Pettigrew, D N Ku.   

Abstract

Nuclear magnetic resonance (MR) can be used to measure velocities in fluid flow using the technique of phase velocity mapping. Advantages of MR velocimetry include the simultaneous mapping of the entire flow field through a non-contacting, magnetic window. The phase velocity mapping technique assumes that velocity is constant over the measurement time (typically around 10 ms). For many fluid flows, this assumption is not valid. The current study showed that MR phase velocity measurements of velocity through stenotic flow can be in error by over 100% immediately upstream and downstream of the stenosis throat and by 20% far downstream of the throat in comparison with laser Doppler anemometer measurements taken at the same location. Highly turbulent flow also led to significant errors in velocity measurement. These errors can be attributed to several sources including low signal-to-noise ratio, additional phase shifts due to non-constant velocities, and non-stationary transit-time effects. Velocity measurement errors could be reduced to under 30% at all measurement locations through the use of MR sequences with high signal-to-noise ratios, low echo times, and thick slices.

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8945670

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  3 in total

1.  Comparing velocity and fluid shear stress in a stenotic phantom with steady flow: phase-contrast MRI, particle image velocimetry and computational fluid dynamics.

Authors:  Iman Khodarahmi
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2014-12-12       Impact factor: 2.310

2.  A New Method for Quantifying Abdominal Aortic Wall Shear Stress Using Phase Contrast Magnetic Resonance Imaging and the Womersley Solution.

Authors:  Elizabeth Iffrig; Lucas H Timmins; Retta El Sayed; W Robert Taylor; John N Oshinski
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2022-09-01       Impact factor: 1.899

Review 3.  Phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging to assess renal perfusion: a systematic review and statement paper.

Authors:  Giulia Villa; Steffen Ringgaard; Ingo Hermann; Rebecca Noble; Paolo Brambilla; Dinah S Khatir; Frank G Zöllner; Susan T Francis; Nicholas M Selby; Andrea Remuzzi; Anna Caroli
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2019-08-17       Impact factor: 2.310

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.