Literature DB >> 8945654

Crank inertial load has little effect on steady-state pedaling coordination.

B J Fregly1, F E Zajac, C A Dairaghi.   

Abstract

Inertial load can affect the control of a dynamic system whenever parts of the system are accelerated or decelerated. During steady-state pedaling, because within-cycle variations in crank angular acceleration still exist, the amount of crank inertia present (which varies widely with road-riding gear ratio) may affect the within-cycle coordination of muscles. However, the effect of inertial load on steady-state pedaling coordination is almost always assumed to be negligible, since the net mechanical energy per cycle developed by muscles only depends on the constant cadence and workload. This study test the hypothesis that under steady-state conditions, the net joint torques produced by muscles at the hip, knee, and ankle are unaffected by crank inertial load. To perform the investigation, we constructed a pedaling apparatus which could emulate the low inertial load of a standard ergometer or the high inertial load of a road bicycle in high gear. Crank angle and bilateral pedal force and angle data were collected from ten subjects instructed to pedal steadily (i.e., constant speed across cycles) and smoothly (i.e., constant speed within a cycle) against both inertias at a constant workload. Virtually no statistically significant changes were found in the net hip and knee muscle joint torques calculated from an inverse dynamics analysis. Though the net ankle muscle joint torque, as well as the one- and two-legged crank torque, showed statistically significant increases at the higher inertia, the changes were small. In contrast, large statistically significant reductions were found in crank kinematic variability both within a cycle and between cycles (i.e., cadence), primarily because a larger inertial load means a slower crank dynamic response. Nonetheless, the reduction in cadence variability was somewhat attenuated by a large statistically significant increase in one-legged crank torque variability. We suggest, therefore, that muscle coordination during steady-state pedaling is largely unaffected, though less well regulated, when crank inertial load is increased.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8945654

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  5 in total

1.  Influence of road incline and body position on power-cadence relationship in endurance cycling.

Authors:  Umberto Emanuele; Jachen Denoth
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2011-11-02       Impact factor: 3.078

2.  Muscular activity level during pedalling is not affected by crank inertial load.

Authors:  S Duc; V Villerius; W Bertucci; J N Pernin; F Grappe
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2005-07-20       Impact factor: 3.078

3.  Evidence for freely chosen pedalling rate during submaximal cycling to be a robust innate voluntary motor rhythm.

Authors:  Ernst Albin Hansen; Ann Elisabeth Ohnstad
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-12-11       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Influence of crank length and crank width on maximal hand cycling power and cadence.

Authors:  Christian Krämer; Lutz Hilker; Harald Böhm
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2009-05-12       Impact factor: 3.078

5.  Comparison of Forward and Reverse Wingate Anaerobic Tests: A Brief Technical Note.

Authors:  Joseph Berning; Trish Gail Sevene; Mark DeBeliso; Carole Carson; Chad Harris; Mike Climstein; Kent Jason Adams
Journal:  J Lifestyle Med       Date:  2019-07-31
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.