Literature DB >> 894536

Acetylcholine receptor distribution on myotubes in culture correlated to acetylcholine sensitivity.

B R Land, T R Podleski, E E Salpeter, M M Salpeter.   

Abstract

1. A linear relation, with a slope of 0-9 +/- 0-2 on a log-log plot, was obtained between acetylcholine (ACh) sensitivity and alpha-bungarotoxin (alpha-BTX) binding site density in developing L6 and rat primary myotubes. ACh sensitivity was defined as g/Qn where g is conductance, Q is ACh charge and n is the Hill coefficient. Experimentally we found n approximately 1-7 for our myotubes, which is similar in value to that reported for adult systems. 2. The linear relationship is compatible with an organization whereby each ion channel is always complexed with a fixed number of ACh receptors such that the dose-response characteristics of each such complex are independent of average ACh receptor density. 3. Light microscope autoradiography showed that the alpha-bungarotoxin binding sites on L6 myotubes are uniformly distributed over the surface, while primary rat myotubes exhibit gradients and hot spots. Electron microscope autoradiography indicated that about 70% of the [125I]alpha-bungarotoxin label was on the surface of the myotubes. The alpha-bungarotoxin site density, after subtracting myoblast background, varied from 5 to 400 sites/micrometer2 on different L6 myotubes, and from 54 to 900 sites/micrometer2 on primary rat myotubes, with occasional hot spots of 3000-4000 sites/micrometer2. The conductance sensitivities varied from 10(-4) to 2 X 10(-2) Momega-1/nC1-7.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1977        PMID: 894536      PMCID: PMC1283707          DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.1977.sp011897

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Physiol        ISSN: 0022-3751            Impact factor:   5.182


  38 in total

1.  Scanning electron microscopy of epithelia prepared by blunt dissection.

Authors:  M M Miller; J P Revel
Journal:  Anat Rec       Date:  1975-10

Review 2.  The acetylcholine receptor and the ionic conductance modulation system of skeletal muscle.

Authors:  E A Barnard; J O Dolly; C W Porter; E X Albuquerque
Journal:  Exp Neurol       Date:  1975-07       Impact factor: 5.330

3.  The distribution of acetylcholine sensitivity at the post-synaptic membrane of vertebrate skeletal twitch muscles: iontophoretic mapping in the micron range.

Authors:  S W Kuffler; D Yoshikami
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1975-01       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  Synapse formation between clonal muscle cells and rat spinal cord explants.

Authors:  Y Kidokoro; S Heinemann
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1974-12-13       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Development of acetylcholine receptor clusters on cultured muscle cells.

Authors:  A J Sytkowski; Z Vogel; M W Nirenberg
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1973-01       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Acetycholine receptor production and incorporation into membranes of developing muscle fibers.

Authors:  H C Hartzell; D M Fambrough
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  1973-01       Impact factor: 3.582

7.  The distribution of acetylcholine sensitivity over uninnervated and innervated muscle fibers grown in cell culture.

Authors:  G D Fischbach; S A Cohen
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  1973-03       Impact factor: 3.582

8.  Post-synaptic potentiation: interaction between quanta of acetylcholine at the skeletal neuromuscular synapse.

Authors:  H C Hartzell; S W Kuffler; D Yoshikami
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1975-10       Impact factor: 5.182

9.  Acetylcholine responses on clonal myogenic cells in vitro.

Authors:  J H Steinbach
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1975-05       Impact factor: 5.182

10.  Quantitation of junctional and extrajunctional acetylcholine receptors by electron microscope autoradiography after 125I-alpha-bungarotoxin binding at mouse neuromuscular junctions.

Authors:  H C Fertuck; M M Salpeter
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1976-04       Impact factor: 10.539

View more
  30 in total

1.  Acetylcholine receptors are not functionally independent.

Authors:  E Yeramian; A Trautmann; P Claverie
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1986-08       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  Clusters of intramembranous particles on cultured myotubes at sites that are highly sensitive to acetylcholine.

Authors:  A G Yee; G D Fischbach; M J Karnovsky
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1978-06       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Distribution of acetylcholine receptors at frog neuromuscular junctions with a discussion of some physiological implications.

Authors:  J Matthews-Bellinger; M M Salpeter
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1978-06       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  Kinetics of unliganded acetylcholine receptor channel gating.

Authors:  M B Jackson
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1986-03       Impact factor: 4.033

5.  Dependence of acetylcholine receptor channel kinetics on agonist concentration in cultured mouse muscle fibres.

Authors:  M B Jackson
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1988-03       Impact factor: 5.182

6.  Association of acetylcholine receptors with peripheral membrane proteins: evidence from antibody-induced coaggregation.

Authors:  R J Bloch; R Sealock; D W Pumplin; P W Luther; S C Froehner
Journal:  J Membr Biol       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 1.843

7.  A post-natal decrease in acetylcholine channel open time at rat end-plates.

Authors:  G D Fischbach; S M Schuetze
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1980-06       Impact factor: 5.182

8.  Non-specific, time-dependent desensitization of the vas deferens and anococcygeus preparations of the rat to alpha 1-adrenoceptor antagonists and atropine.

Authors:  I Onnen
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  1984-09       Impact factor: 8.739

9.  Molecular mechanism of acetylcholine receptor-controlled ion translocation across cell membranes.

Authors:  D J Cash; G P Hess
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1980-02       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Degradation of acetylcholine receptors in muscle cells: effect of leupeptin on turnover rate, intracellular pool sizes, and receptor properties.

Authors:  C Hyman; S C Froehner
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1983-05       Impact factor: 10.539

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.