Literature DB >> 8944853

Induced abortion as an independent risk factor for breast cancer: a comprehensive review and meta-analysis.

J Brind1, V M Chinchilli, W B Severs, J Summy-Long.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVE: To ascertain, from the published reports to date, whether or not a significantly increased risk of breast cancer is specifically attributable to a history of induced abortion, independent of spontaneous abortion and age at first full term pregnancy (or first live birth); to establish the relative magnitude of such risk increase as may be found, and to ascertain and quantify such risk increases as may pertain to particular subpopulations of women exposed to induced abortion; in particular, nulliparous women and parous women exposed before compared with after the first full term pregnancy. INCLUDED STUDIES: The meta-analysis includes all 28 published reports which include specific data on induced abortion and breast cancer incidence. Since some study data are presented in more than one report, the 28 reports were determined to constitute 23 independent studies. Overall induced abortion odds ratios and odds ratios for the different subpopulations were calculated using an average weighted according to the inverse of the variance. An overall unweighted average was also computed for comparison. No quality criteria were imposed, but a narrative review of all included studies is presented for the reader's use in assessing the quality of individual studies. EXCLUDED STUDIES: All 33 published reports including data on abortion and breast cancer incidence but either pertaining only to spontaneous abortion or to abortion without specification as to whether it was induced or spontaneous. These studies are listed for the reader's information.
RESULTS: The overall odds ratio (for any induced abortion exposure; n = 21 studies) was 1.3 (95% confidence interval of 1.2, 1.4). For comparison, the unweighted overall odds ratio was 1.4 (1.3,1.6). The odds ratio for nulliparous women was 1.3 (1.0,1.6), that for abortion before the first term pregnancy in parous women was 1.5 (1.2,1.8), and that for abortion after the first term pregnancy was 1.3 (1.1,1.5).
CONCLUSIONS: The results support the inclusion of induced abortion among significant independent risk factors for breast cancer, regardless of parity or timing of abortion relative to the first term pregnancy. Although the increase in risk was relatively low, the high incidence of both breast cancer and induced abortion suggest a substantial impact of thousands of excess cases per year currently, and a potentially much greater impact in the next century, as the first cohort of women exposed to legal induced abortion continues to age.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8944853      PMCID: PMC1060338          DOI: 10.1136/jech.50.5.481

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health        ISSN: 0143-005X            Impact factor:   3.710


  69 in total

Review 1.  Breast cancer (1)

Authors:  J R Harris; M E Lippman; U Veronesi; W Willett
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1992-07-30       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Breast cancer in relation to the occurrence and time of induced and spontaneous abortion.

Authors:  L Rosenberg; J R Palmer; D W Kaufman; B L Strom; D Schottenfeld; S Shapiro
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 4.897

3.  Early abortion and breast cancer risk among women under age 40.

Authors:  H L Howe; R T Senie; H Bzduch; P Herzfeld
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 7.196

4.  Epidemiologic characteristics of cancer of the breast in Taiwan.

Authors:  T M Lin; K P Chen; B MacMahon
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1971-06       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  Epidemiologic features of breast cancer in Slovenia, 1965-1967.

Authors:  B Ravnihar; B MacMahon; J Lindtner
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  1971-08       Impact factor: 9.162

Review 6.  Reproductive factors and breast cancer.

Authors:  J L Kelsey; M D Gammon; E M John
Journal:  Epidemiol Rev       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 6.222

7.  Familial risk of breast cancer and abortion.

Authors:  N Andrieu; F Clavel; B Gairard; L Piana; A Brémond; J Lansac; R Flamant; R Renaud
Journal:  Cancer Detect Prev       Date:  1994

8.  Meta-analysis/Shmeta-analysis.

Authors:  S Shapiro
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1994-11-01       Impact factor: 4.897

9.  Of babies and bathwater.

Authors:  D B Petitti
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1994-11-01       Impact factor: 4.897

10.  Risk factors of breast cancer in Finland.

Authors:  I Soini
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  1977-12       Impact factor: 7.196

View more
  19 in total

1.  Abortion and breast cancer: a case-control record linkage study.

Authors:  M J Goldacre; L M Kurina; V Seagroatt; D Yeates
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 3.710

2.  Selling sickness: the pharmaceutical industry and disease mongering.

Authors:  Ray Moynihan; Iona Heath; David Henry
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-04-13

3.  Abortion perils debated.

Authors:  Shauna C Hollingshead
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2003-07-22       Impact factor: 8.262

4.  Interactions between genetic and reproductive factors in breast cancer risk in a French family sample.

Authors:  N Andrieu; F Demenais
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 11.025

Review 5.  Where do we draw the line?

Authors:  Jonathan Gornall
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2007-02-10

6.  Induced abortion as an independent risk factor for breast cancer.

Authors:  M Blettner; J Chang-Claude; T Scheuchenpflug
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 3.710

7.  Abortion, breast cancer, and impact factors--in this number and the last.

Authors:  S Donnan
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 3.710

8.  Adjusting the Medical Record for a Pro-Life Practice.

Authors:  Azar P Dagher; Marie A Anderson; Karen Cassidy
Journal:  Linacre Q       Date:  2013-08-01

9.  When the entire population is the sample: strengths and limitations in register-based epidemiology.

Authors:  Lau Caspar Thygesen; Annette Kjær Ersbøll
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2014-01-10       Impact factor: 8.082

10.  Association between history of abortion and metabolic syndrome in middle-aged and elderly Chinese women.

Authors:  Baihui Xu; Jie Zhang; Yu Xu; Jieli Lu; Min Xu; Yuhong Chen; Yufang Bi; Guang Ning
Journal:  Front Med       Date:  2013-02-06       Impact factor: 4.592

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.