Literature DB >> 8944450

Incidence and nature of bile duct injuries following laparoscopic cholecystectomy: an audit of 5913 cases. West of Scotland Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Audit Group.

M C Richardson1, G Bell, G M Fullarton.   

Abstract

The rapid introduction of laparoscopic cholecystectomy has been associated with an apparently increased incidence of bile duct injury which has provoked worldwide concern. The true incidence and mechanism of iatrogenic ductal injury during the development of this procedure remain unclear. To assess this, the introduction of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the West of Scotland has been audited prospectively over a 5-year period. All cases of biliary ductal injury have been independently reviewed. Some 48 surgeons undertaking laparoscopic cholecystectomy in 19 hospitals submitted prospective data between September 1990 and September 1995. A total of 5913 laparoscopic cholecystectomies were attempted with 98.3 per cent completion of data collection. During this period 37 laparoscopic bile duct injuries occurred. The annual incidence peaked at 0.8 per cent and has fallen to 0.4 per cent in the final year of audit. Injuries occurred after a median personal experience of 51 (range 3-247) laparoscopic cholecystectomies in 22 surgeons. Major bile duct injuries occurred in 20 of 37 patients, giving an incidence of 0.3 per cent. Five mechanisms for laparoscopic ductal injury were identified, including tenting, confluence and diathermy injuries as well as the classical and variant classical types. Ductal injuries were discovered at operation in 18 patients with consequent repair giving a good clinical outcome in 17. Contributory factors (severe inflammation, aberrant anatomy and poor visualization) were present in only 13 of 37 cases. This audit suggests that, at least in the introductory period, laparoscopic cholecystectomy is associated with an overall bile duct injury rate higher than that reported previously after open cholecystectomy, although the incidence of major ductal injury is similar. The late downward trend in bile duct injury, however, suggests there may be a prolonged learning curve for this procedure. Improved understanding of the mechanism of injury may lead to yet further reductions in this complication.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8944450     DOI: 10.1002/bjs.1800831009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Surg        ISSN: 0007-1323            Impact factor:   6.939


  79 in total

1.  Intraoperative cholangiography and bile duct injury in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  J M Manson
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Congenital anatomical abnormalities of the extrahepatic biliary duct: a personal audit.

Authors:  M Lamah; G H Dickson
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 1.246

3.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in routine practice: duct injury as an index event.

Authors:  T F Gorey; P Papasavas
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  1999 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 1.568

4.  Bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  F G Moody
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Results of a new strategy for reconstruction of biliary injuries having an isolated right-sided component.

Authors:  S M Strasberg; D D Picus; J A Drebin
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2001 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.452

6.  Bile duct injuries during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a 1994-2001 audit on 13,718 operations in the area of Rome.

Authors:  P Gentileschi; M Di Paola; M Catarci; E Santoro; L Montemurro; M Carlini; E Nanni; L Alessandroni; R Angeloni; B Benini; F Cristini; A Dalla Torre; C De Stefano; A Gatto; F Gossetti; S Manfroni; P Mascagni; L Masoni; G Montalto; D Polito; E Puce; G Silecchia; A Terenzi; M Valle; S Vita; T Zanarini
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-12-29       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 7.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: early and late complications and their treatment.

Authors:  A Shamiyeh; W Wayand
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2004-05-05       Impact factor: 3.445

8.  Intraoperative cholangiography in the laparoscopic cholecystectomy era: why are we still debating?

Authors:  F Ausania; L R Holmes; F Ausania; S Iype; P Ricci; S A White
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-03-22       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  How should single-access or natural orifice cholecystectomy be introduced?

Authors:  Saxon J Connor
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 3.647

10.  A safe laparoscopic cholecystectomy depends upon the establishment of a critical view of safety.

Authors:  Yuichi Yamashita; Taizo Kimura; Sumio Matsumoto
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2010-05-23       Impact factor: 2.549

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.