C J Mulder1, W Dekker, M Gerretsen. 1. Department of Hepatogastroenterology, Rijnstate Hospital, Arnhem, The Netherlands.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To compare the efficacy and safety of lansoprazole 30 mg daily (LAN30) and omeprazole 40 mg daily (OME40) in the treatment of moderate (Savary-Miller grade II) as well as severe reflux oesophagitis (grade III/IVa). DESIGN: A double-blind, randomized, multicentre study, involving 211 patients at 29 Dutch hospitals. METHODS:Healing was assessed by endoscopy, performed on admission, after 4 weeks and after 8 weeks if the patient was not healed after 4 weeks. Symptom relief was determined by symptom assessments at the same time points. Safety was evaluated by determining the incidence of adverse events. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in intention-to-treat (ITT) healing rates after 4 weeks (LAN30 87.5%, OME40 80.6%; 95% CI (-4.0; +17.8)) and in the ITT overall healing (LAN30 96.1%, OME40 93.1%; 95% CI (-4.2; +10.2)) rates between the LAN30 and the OME40 group. Relief of reflux-related symptoms at 4 weeks as well as 8 weeks did not differ significantly between the treatment groups. No difference in the incidence of adverse events was observed between the groups. CONCLUSION: Treatment of patients with reflux oesophagitis grade II, III or IVa withLAN30 was as effective as with OME40 with respect to healing as well as symptom relief.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVES: To compare the efficacy and safety of lansoprazole 30 mg daily (LAN30) and omeprazole 40 mg daily (OME40) in the treatment of moderate (Savary-Miller grade II) as well as severe reflux oesophagitis (grade III/IVa). DESIGN: A double-blind, randomized, multicentre study, involving 211 patients at 29 Dutch hospitals. METHODS: Healing was assessed by endoscopy, performed on admission, after 4 weeks and after 8 weeks if the patient was not healed after 4 weeks. Symptom relief was determined by symptom assessments at the same time points. Safety was evaluated by determining the incidence of adverse events. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in intention-to-treat (ITT) healing rates after 4 weeks (LAN30 87.5%, OME40 80.6%; 95% CI (-4.0; +17.8)) and in the ITT overall healing (LAN30 96.1%, OME40 93.1%; 95% CI (-4.2; +10.2)) rates between the LAN30 and the OME40 group. Relief of reflux-related symptoms at 4 weeks as well as 8 weeks did not differ significantly between the treatment groups. No difference in the incidence of adverse events was observed between the groups. CONCLUSION: Treatment of patients with reflux oesophagitis grade II, III or IVa with LAN30 was as effective as with OME40 with respect to healing as well as symptom relief.
Authors: Thomas O Kovacs; James W Freston; Marian M Haber; Barbara Hunt; Stuart Atkinson; David A Peura Journal: Dig Dis Sci Date: 2009-03-07 Impact factor: 3.199