Literature DB >> 8944181

A comparison of tests to determine acuity deficits in children with amblyopia.

I Geer1, C A Westall.   

Abstract

The usefulness of the Cardiff Acuity Test in the detection of amblyopia was evaluated. Visual function was measured using pattern visual evoked potentials (VEPs), the Cardiff test, and the Bailey-Lovie Chart in 21 visually normal children and 12 children with amblyopia. The Cardiff test gave higher scores than the Bailey-Lovie test. The Cardiff test identified five of the 12 children who were classified as amblyopic by the Bailey-Lovie test. Interocular VEP latency differences identified eight of the 12 children with amblyopia; interocular VEP amplitudes correctly identified nine. We suggest that the challenging Bailey-Lovie test be used for older children who know their letters well. If the Bailey-Lovie test cannot be used, VEPs give the most accurate assessment of interocular differences. The Cardiff test holds a bored child's attention and allows the examiner to obtain a useful measure of visual acuity, but it cannot detect mild amounts of amblyopia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8944181

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt        ISSN: 0275-5408            Impact factor:   3.117


  3 in total

1.  Reliability of a standardized reading chart system: variance component analysis, test-retest and inter-chart reliability.

Authors:  Eva Stifter; Franz König; Thomas Lang; Peter Bauer; Sibylla Richter-Müksch; Michaela Velikay-Parel; Wolfgang Radner
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2003-12-10       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  Adult discrimination performance for pediatric acuity test optotypes.

Authors:  T Rowan Candy; Sylvia R Mishoulam; Robert M Nosofsky; Velma Dobson
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2011-06-16       Impact factor: 4.799

3.  Vision screening at two years does not reduce the prevalence of reduced vision at four and a half years of age.

Authors:  Lucy Goodman; Arijit Chakraborty; Nabin Paudel; Tzu-Ying Yu; Robert J Jacobs; Jane E Harding; Benjamin Thompson; Nicola S Anstice
Journal:  Clin Exp Optom       Date:  2017-11-28       Impact factor: 2.742

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.