Literature DB >> 8943496

Nutritional and prognostic correlates of bioimpedance indexes in hemodialysis patients.

Q Maggiore1, S Nigrelli, C Ciccarelli, C Grimaldi, G A Rossi, C Michelassi.   

Abstract

We carried out a cross sectional and longitudinal study to assess whether bioimpedance indexes (resistance, Rz; reactance, Xc; phase angle, PA) reflect the nutritional status of hemodialysis (HD) patients, and bear a significant association with their long-term survival. The bioimpedance data of 131 patients on chronic HD treatment were compared with those of 272 healthy controls matched for age and sex. Nutritional status was assessed by anthropometric variables, serum albumin (SA), normalized protein catabolic rate (nPCR), and subjective global assessment (SGA). All three bioimpedance indexes varied significantly with HD treatment, however, with the exception of Xc in post-HD, they were on average significantly (P < 0.016) different from controls either pre- and post-HD. Post-HD PA appeared to be the best index of nutritional status, being significantly correlated with SA, age, mid arm muscle circumference (MAMC), SGA, and nPCR (R2 = 0.44; P < 0.01). However, depending on the cut-off levels, PA failed to detect clinically overt malnutrition in one to two thirds of the patients with the worst SGA score. During the follow-up the changes in bioimpedance indexes reflected poorly the changes in dry blood weight, only delta Rz bore a significant correlation (r = 0.29; P < 0.01) with delta body wt. Patients having baseline phase angle values within the lower quartile had a significantly lower two-year survival rate than patients having higher values (59.3% vs. 91.3%; P < 0.01). Cox's analysis (proportional hazard model) showed that phase angle as a predictor of death outweighed all other parameters included in the model (age, SA, nPCR, MAMC, SGA), with a relative risk of 2.6 (95% CI = 1.6 to 4.2). Bioimpedance indexes do not appear to be reliable in detecting clinically overt depletion of lean body mass. However, the strong association of PA with patient survival suggests that this bioimpedance index reflects some dimension of the illness, which is not fully identifiable with the deranged nutritional status.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8943496     DOI: 10.1038/ki.1996.535

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Kidney Int        ISSN: 0085-2538            Impact factor:   10.612


  45 in total

1.  Bioelectrical impedance phase angle as indicator and predictor of cachexia in head and neck cancer patients treated with (chemo)radiotherapy.

Authors:  P Stegel; N R Kozjek; B A Brumen; P Strojan
Journal:  Eur J Clin Nutr       Date:  2016-02-24       Impact factor: 4.016

Review 2.  Physical methods for evaluating the nutrition status of hemodialysis patients.

Authors:  Daniele Marcelli; Peter Wabel; Sebastian Wieskotten; Annalisa Ciotola; Aileen Grassmann; Attilio Di Benedetto; Bernard Canaud
Journal:  J Nephrol       Date:  2015-03-20       Impact factor: 3.902

3.  Bioelectrical impedance phase angle as a prognostic indicator of survival in head-and-neck cancer.

Authors:  M S Władysiuk; R Mlak; K Morshed; W Surtel; A Brzozowska; T Małecka-Massalska
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2016-10-25       Impact factor: 3.677

4.  Associations between bioelectrical impedance parameters and cardiovascular events in chronic dialysis patients.

Authors:  Aline de Araujo Antunes; Francieli Delatim Vannini; Liciana Vaz de Arruda Silveira; Pasqual Barretti; Luis Cuadrado Martin; Jacqueline Costa Teixeira Caramori
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2012-12-04       Impact factor: 2.370

5.  Protein-energy wasting, as well as overweight and obesity, is a long-term risk factor for mortality in chronic hemodialysis patients.

Authors:  Liviu Segall; Mihaela Moscalu; Simona Hogaş; Irina Mititiuc; Ionuţ Nistor; Gabriel Veisa; Adrian Covic
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2014-01-29       Impact factor: 2.370

6.  Impedance ratio: a novel marker and a powerful predictor of mortality in hemodialysis patients.

Authors:  C Demirci; G Aşcı; M S Demirci; M Özkahya; H Töz; S Duman; S Sipahi; S Erten; M Tanrısev; E Ok
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2016-04-19       Impact factor: 2.370

7.  Anthropometric Predictors of Bio-Impedance Analysis (BIA) Phase Angle in Healthy Adults.

Authors:  Nazeem Ishrat Siddiqui; Sarfaraz Alam Khan; Mohammad Shoeb; Sukhwant Bose
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2016-06-01

8.  Bioelectrical impedance phase angle and subjective global assessment in detecting malnutrition among newly diagnosed head and neck cancer patients.

Authors:  Teresa Małecka-Massalska; Radoslaw Mlak; Agata Smolen; Kamal Morshed
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2015-04-10       Impact factor: 2.503

9.  Phase angle, frailty and mortality in older adults.

Authors:  Emilee R Wilhelm-Leen; Yoshio N Hall; Ralph I Horwitz; Glenn M Chertow
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 5.128

10.  Nutrition assessment and its effect on various clinical variables among patients undergoing liver transplant.

Authors:  Neha Bakshi; Kalyani Singh
Journal:  Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 7.293

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.