Literature DB >> 8942881

Comparison of ciprofloxacin ophthalmic solution 0.3% to fortified tobramycin-cefazolin in treating bacterial corneal ulcers. Ciprofloxacin Bacterial Keratitis Study Group.

R A Hyndiuk1, R A Eiferman, D R Caldwell, G O Rosenwasser, C I Santos, H R Katz, S S Badrinath, M K Reddy, J P Adenis, V Klauss.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of the study is to compare the clinical efficacy and safety of ciprofloxacin ophthalmic solution 0.3% (Ciloxan) with a standard therapy regimen (fortified tobramycin, 1.3%-cefazolin, 5.0%) for treating bacterial corneal ulcers.
METHODS: This randomized, parallel group, double-masked, multicenter study was conducted in 324 patients at 28 centers in the United States, Europe, and India. Patients were randomized into 2 treatment groups: 160 to ciprofloxacin and 164 to fortified tobramycin-cefazolin. Positive microbiologic cultures were obtained in 188 (58%) of 324 patients. Of these, 176 patients met protocol criteria and were evaluated for treatment efficacy: 82 in the ciprofloxacin group and 94 in the standard therapy group. The dosing schedule for both treatment groups was 1 to 2 drops of the first study medication (ciprofloxacin or fortified tobramycin) every 30 minutes for 6 hours, then hourly for the remainder of day 1; 1 to 2 drops every hour on days 2 and 3; 1 to 2 drops every 2 hours on days 4 and 5, followed by 1 to 2 drops every 4 hours on days 6 to 14. The second medication (ciprofloxacin or cefazolin) was instilled 5 to 15 minutes after the first drug, following the same dosing frequency. Physician's judgment of clinical success, cure rate, changes in ocular sings, and symptoms and the rate of treatment failures were the primary efficacy criteria.
RESULTS: Topical ciprofloxacin monotherapy is equivalent clinically and statistically to the standard therapy regimen of fortified antibiotics. No statistically significant treatment differences were found between ciprofloxacin (91.5%) and standard therapy (86.2%) in terms of overall clinical efficacy (P = 0.34). Similarly, no differences were noted in resolution of the clinical signs and symptoms (P > 0.08) or the time to cure (P = 0.55). The incidence of treatment failures was less in the ciprofloxacin group (8.5%) compared with the standard therapy group (13.8%). Significantly fewer patients treated with ciprofloxacin reported discomfort than did patients treated with the standard therapy regimen (P = 0.01).
CONCLUSION: Ciprofloxacin ophthalmic solution 0.3% monotherapy is equivalent clinically and statistically to standard therapy (fortified tobramycin-cefazolin) for the treatment of bacterial corneal ulcers and produces significantly less discomfort.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8942881     DOI: 10.1016/s0161-6420(96)30416-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmology        ISSN: 0161-6420            Impact factor:   12.079


  30 in total

1.  In vitro antibiotic resistance in bacterial keratitis in London.

Authors:  S J Tuft; M Matheson
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 4.638

2.  Microbial keratitis.

Authors:  B H Jeng; S D McLeod
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 4.638

3.  Microbial keratitis: what's the preferred initial therapy? View 1: corneal scraping and combination antibiotic therapy is indicated.

Authors:  R Mills
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 4.638

4.  Overview: Initial antimicrobial therapy for microbial keratitis.

Authors:  M Daniell
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 4.638

5.  Initial therapy for suppurative microbial keratitis in Iraq.

Authors:  Faiz Al-Shakarchi
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-06-27       Impact factor: 4.638

Review 6.  Corneal ulceration in pediatric patients: a brief overview of progress in topical treatment.

Authors:  Serina Stretton; Usha Gopinathan; Mark D P Willcox
Journal:  Paediatr Drugs       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 3.022

Review 7.  [Therapy and prognosis of bacterial keratitis].

Authors:  W Behrens-Baumann; U Pleyer
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 1.059

8.  Changing trends in the clinical course and outcome of bacterial keratitis at King Khaled Eye Specialist Hospital.

Authors:  Ali Al-Shehri; Sabah Jastaneiah; Michael D Wagoner
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-04-03       Impact factor: 2.031

9.  Corticosteroids for bacterial corneal ulcers.

Authors:  M Srinivasan; P Lalitha; R Mahalakshmi; N V Prajna; J Mascarenhas; J D Chidambaram; S Lee; K C Hong; M Zegans; D V Glidden; S McLeod; J P Whitcher; T M Lietman; N R Acharya
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-10-01       Impact factor: 4.638

10.  Mutations in the quinolone resistance determining region in Staphylococcus epidermidis recovered from conjunctiva and their association with susceptibility to various fluoroquinolones.

Authors:  M Yamada; J Yoshida; S Hatou; T Yoshida; Y Minagawa
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-05-06       Impact factor: 4.638

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.