Literature DB >> 8942845

Quality of life assessment in pregnant women with the human immunodeficiency virus.

K D Larrabee1, M Monga, N Eriksen, A Helfgott.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To describe the perceived quality of life and functional status of women with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) during the antenatal, perinatal, and postpartum periods.
METHODS: Medical Outcome Survey-Short Form questionnaires were completed during antenatal visits, 24 hours after delivery, and 6 months postpartum by 21 HIV-positive women and 21 HIV-negative controls matched for age, race, parity, and education. The Medical Outcome Survey-Short Form measures subject perceptions of overall health, pain, physical role, social and cognitive function, mental health, energy/fatigue, health distress, quality of life, and health transition. Median scores between 0 and 100 (with 0 indicating poorest health) were compared using the Wilcoxon signed-rank and Kruskal Wallis/Dunn tests.
RESULTS: All HIV-positive patients were asymptomatic; the median CD4 count was 386 on entry into the study. Seropositive patients reported increased health distress (50.0 versus 87.5; P < .001) and worse health transition (60.0 versus 80.0; P = .01) during antenatal visits. During the perinatal period, HIV-negative patients had a decreased sense of overall health (40 versus 80; P < .001) and worse health transition (40.0 versus 60.0; P = .04). Six months postpartum, the HIV-positive women reported decreased cognitive function (41.7 versus 62.5; P < .005) and worse social function (33.3 versus 66.7; P = .02). In general, HIV-negative women reported better quality of life in the antepartum as compared with the perinatal or postpartum period. This overall trend was also seen in the HIV-positive population.
CONCLUSIONS: This is the first longitudinal evaluation of perceived quality of life in HIV-positive pregnant subjects. We conclude that perceived quality of life differs between HIV-positive and HIV-negative pregnant women. These differences may not be manifest during initial antenatal visits but may develop as pregnancy, the disease process, and other life events specific to delivery and the postpartum period interact and affect overall perceived quality of life. Longitudinal evaluation of quality-of-life issues may be important in the comprehensive care of HIV-positive women during pregnancy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8942845     DOI: 10.1016/s0029-7844(96)00332-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  9 in total

Review 1.  Mental health of HIV-seropositive women during pregnancy and postpartum period: a comprehensive literature review.

Authors:  Suad Kapetanovic; Priscilla Dass-Brailsford; Diana Nora; Nicholas Talisman
Journal:  AIDS Behav       Date:  2014-06

Review 2.  Evidence for reliability, validity and usefulness of the Medical Outcomes Study HIV Health Survey (MOS-HIV).

Authors:  A W Wu; D A Revicki; D Jacobson; F E Malitz
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 4.147

3.  Quality of life, optimism/pessimism, and knowledge and attitudes toward HIV Screening among pregnant women in Ghana.

Authors:  Cheryl A Moyer; Geraldine Ekpo; Cecilia L Calhoun; Jonathan Greene; Sujata Naik; Emily Sippola; David T Stern; Richard M Adanu; Isaac O Koranteng; Enyonam Yao Kwawukume; Frank J Anderson
Journal:  Womens Health Issues       Date:  2008-05-15

4.  A Systematic Review of Quality of Life Measures in Pregnant and Postpartum Mothers.

Authors:  Mulubrhan F Mogos; Euna M August; Abraham A Salinas-Miranda; Dawood H Sultan; Hamisu M Salihu
Journal:  Appl Res Qual Life       Date:  2013-06-01

5.  Prevalence and risk factors for postpartum depression symptoms among women with disabilities.

Authors:  Monika Mitra; Lisa I Iezzoni; Jianying Zhang; Linda M Long-Bellil; Suzanne C Smeltzer; Bruce A Barton
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2015-02

6.  Measuring health related quality of life among women living with HIV.

Authors:  K A McDonnell; A C Gielen; A W Wu; P O'Campo; R Faden
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 3.440

7.  When outcome is a balance: methods to measure combined utility for the choice between induction of labour and expectant management in mild risk pregnancy at term.

Authors:  Denise Bijlenga; Erwin Birnie; Ben W J Mol; Gouke J Bonsel
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2007-07-04       Impact factor: 3.007

Review 8.  A review of mothers' prenatal and postnatal quality of life.

Authors:  Andrew Symon
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2003-09-03       Impact factor: 3.186

9.  Reproductive health and lifestyle factors associated with health-related quality of life among perinatally HIV-infected adolescents in Uganda.

Authors:  Scovia Nalugo Mbalinda; Noah Kiwanuka; Dan K Kaye; Lars E Eriksson
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2015-10-21       Impact factor: 3.186

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.