Literature DB >> 8942828

Racial differences in endometrial cancer survival: the black/white cancer survival study.

H A Hill1, J W Eley, L C Harlan, R S Greenberg, R J Barrett, V W Chen.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To identify factors that explain a lower survival rate among black women with endometrial cancer when compared to white women.
METHODS: Data are from the National Cancer Institute's Black/White Cancer Survival Study, a population-based study of racial differences in cancer survival. Subjects included 329 white and 130 black women, ages 20-79 years, residing in the metropolitan areas of Atlanta, New Orleans, or San Francisco-Oakland, diagnosed with endometrial cancer from 1985 to 1987. Known prognostic factors were assessed as potential explanatory variables for the black-white survival difference using proportional hazards regression. Information was derived from interviews, abstracts of hospital and physicians' records, and a centralized review of biopsy and surgical specimens.
RESULTS: Adjusting for age and geographic location, risk of death among black women was 4.0 times (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.8, 5.6) that of white women. Approximately 40% of this difference could be attributed to a more advanced stage at diagnosis among black women, and 23% to tumor characteristics and treatment. Further adjustment for all remaining factors reduced the hazard ratio to 1.6 (95% CI 1.0, 2.6).
CONCLUSION: Eighty percent of the excess mortality among black women is explained by racial differences in stage at diagnosis, tumor characteristics, treatment, sociodemographic characteristics, hormonal and reproductive factors, and factors related to comorbidities and health behavior. Difference in stage at diagnosis is prominent in explaining the disparity in endometrial cancer survival rates in black and white women. Potential differences in treatment within stage merit further exploration.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8942828     DOI: 10.1016/s0029-7844(96)00341-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  16 in total

1.  The Black-White disparity in pregnancy-related mortality from 5 conditions: differences in prevalence and case-fatality rates.

Authors:  Myra J Tucker; Cynthia J Berg; William M Callaghan; Jason Hsia
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2006-12-28       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  The influence of comorbid conditions on racial disparities in endometrial cancer survival.

Authors:  Julie J Ruterbusch; Rouba Ali-Fehmi; Sara H Olson; Shawnita Sealy-Jefferson; Benjamin A Rybicki; Sharon Hensley-Alford; Mohamed A Elshaikh; Arthur R Gaba; Daniel Schultz; Adnan R Munkarah; Michele L Cote
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2014-06-19       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 3.  Gynecologic cancer disparities: a report from the Health Disparities Taskforce of the Society of Gynecologic Oncology.

Authors:  Yvonne Collins; Kevin Holcomb; Eloise Chapman-Davis; Dineo Khabele; John H Farley
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2014-01-07       Impact factor: 5.482

4.  Rural-urban differences in surgical treatment, regional lymph node examination, and survival in endometrial cancer patients.

Authors:  Whitney E Zahnd; Katherine S Hyon; Paula Diaz-Sylvester; Sonya R Izadi; Graham A Colditz; Laurent Brard
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2017-12-27       Impact factor: 2.506

5.  Racial differences in surgeons and hospitals for endometrial cancer treatment.

Authors:  Katrina Armstrong; Thomas C Randall; Daniel Polsky; Elizabeth Moye; Jeffrey H Silber
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 2.983

6.  Endometrial cancer: socioeconomic status and racial/ethnic differences in stage at diagnosis, treatment, and survival.

Authors:  Terri Madison; David Schottenfeld; Sherman A James; Ann G Schwartz; Stephen B Gruber
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 9.308

7.  Chemotherapy intensity and toxicity among black and white women with advanced and recurrent endometrial cancer: a Gynecologic Oncology Group Study.

Authors:  John H Farley; Chunqiao Tian; G Scott Rose; Carol L Brown; Michael Birrer; John I Risinger; J Tate Thigpen; Gini F Fleming; Holly H Gallion; G Larry Maxwell
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2010-01-15       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  Prognostic significance of mucinous differentiation of endometrioid adenocarcinoma of the endometrium.

Authors:  Vijaya Galic; Maria B Schiavone; Thomas J Herzog; Kevin Holcomb; Sharyn N Lewin; Yu-Shiang Lu; Alfred I Neugut; Dawn L Hershman; Jason D Wright
Journal:  Cancer Invest       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 2.176

9.  Gynecologic cancer outcomes in the elderly poor: A population-based study.

Authors:  Kemi M Doll; Ke Meng; Ethan M Basch; Paola A Gehrig; Wendy R Brewster; Anne-Marie Meyer
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2015-07-31       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  The role of racial genetic admixture with endometrial cancer outcomes: An NRG Oncology/Gynecologic Oncology Group study.

Authors:  Rodney P Rocconi; Heather A Lankes; William E Brady; Paul J Goodfellow; Nilsa C Ramirez; Ronald D Alvarez; William Creasman; José R Fernández
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2015-11-18       Impact factor: 5.482

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.