Literature DB >> 8942692

Collaborative survey of perinatal loss in planned and unplanned home births. Northern Region Perinatal Mortality Survey Coordinating Group.

.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To document the outcome of planned and unplanned births outside hospital.
DESIGN: Confidential review of every pregnancy ending in stillbirth or neonatal death in which plans had been made for home delivery, irrespective of where delivery eventually occurred. The review was part of a sustained collaborative survey of all perinatal deaths.
SETTING: Northern Regional Health Authority area.
SUBJECTS: All 558,691 registered births to women normally resident in the former Northern Regional Health Authority area during 1981-94. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Perinatal death.
RESULTS: The estimated perinatal mortality during 1981-94 among women booked for a home birth was 14 deaths in 2888 births. This was less than half that among all women in the region. Only three of the 14 women delivered outside hospital. Independent review suggested that two of the 14 deaths might have been averted by different management. Both births occurred in hospital, and in only one was management before admission of the mother judged inappropriate. Perinatal loss to the 64 women who booked for hospital delivery but delivered outside and to the 67 women who delivered outside hospital without ever making arrangements to receive professional care during labour accounted for the high perinatal mortality (134 deaths in 3466 deliveries) among all births outside hospital.
CONCLUSIONS: The perinatal hazard associated with planned home birth in the few women who exercised this option (< 1%) was low and mostly unavoidable. Health authorities purchasing maternity care need to address the much greater hazard associated with unplanned delivery outside hospital.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8942692      PMCID: PMC2352740     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ        ISSN: 0959-8138


  19 in total

1.  Prospective regional study of planned home births. Home Birth Study Steering Group.

Authors:  J Davies; E Hey; W Reid; G Young
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-11-23

2.  Home and hospital confinement in Newcastle upon Tyne, 1960 to 1969.

Authors:  S L Barron; A M Thomson; P R Philips
Journal:  Br J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1977-06

3.  Maternity services: the consumer's view.

Authors:  A Taylor
Journal:  J R Coll Gen Pract       Date:  1986-04

4.  Outcomes of 11,788 planned home births attended by certified nurse-midwives. A retrospective descriptive study.

Authors:  R E Anderson; P A Murphy
Journal:  J Nurse Midwifery       Date:  1995 Nov-Dec

5.  Planned and unplanned deliveries at home: implications of a changing ratio.

Authors:  J F Murphy; M Dauncey; O P Gray; I Chalmers
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1984-05-12

6.  Home or hospital birth? A study of women's attitudes.

Authors:  B Shepperdson
Journal:  Health Visit       Date:  1983-11

7.  Home births in England and Wales, 1979: perinatal mortality according to intended place of delivery.

Authors:  R Campbell; I M Davies; A Macfarlane; V Beral
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1984-09-22

8.  The consumers' attitude to obstetric care.

Authors:  B M Morgan; C J Bulpitt; P Clifton; P J Lewis
Journal:  Br J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1984-07

9.  Safety and place of birth in Scotland.

Authors:  S K Cole; A Macfarlane
Journal:  J Public Health Med       Date:  1995-03

Review 10.  Birth choices, the law, and medicine: balancing individual freedoms and protection of the public's health.

Authors:  C Hafner-Eaton; L K Pearce
Journal:  J Health Polit Policy Law       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 2.265

View more
  9 in total

1.  Perinatal mortality and morbidity among babies delivered in water: surveillance study and postal survey.

Authors:  R E Gilbert; P A Tookey
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-08-21

2.  Choosing between home and hospital delivery. Home birth in Britain can be safe.

Authors:  G Young; E Hey
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-03-18

3.  Outcomes and risk factors for unplanned delivery at home and before arrival to the hospital.

Authors:  Zlatko Lazić; Iztok Takač
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2010-12-20       Impact factor: 1.704

4.  Outcomes of planned home births with certified professional midwives: large prospective study in North America.

Authors:  Kenneth C Johnson; Betty-Anne Daviss
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2005-06-18

5.  Cost analysis of planned out-of-hospital births in Italy.

Authors:  Roberta Vittoria Cicero; Sofia Colaceci; Rosanna Amata; Federico Spandonaro
Journal:  Acta Biomed       Date:  2022-08-31

6.  Perinatal death associated with planned home birth in Australia: population based study.

Authors:  H Bastian; M J Keirse; P A Lancaster
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-08-08

7.  Epidemiology of unplanned out-of-hospital births attended by paramedics.

Authors:  Gayle McLelland; Lisa McKenna; Amee Morgans; Karen Smith
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2018-01-08       Impact factor: 3.007

8.  Comparing the odds of postpartum haemorrhage in planned home birth against planned hospital birth: results of an observational study of over 500,000 maternities in the UK.

Authors:  Andrea Nove; Ann Berrington; Zoë Matthews
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2012-11-19       Impact factor: 3.007

Review 9.  Planned home birth: benefits, risks, and opportunities.

Authors:  Ruth Zielinski; Kelly Ackerson; Lisa Kane Low
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2015-04-08
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.