Literature DB >> 8942587

The effects of long-term prone positioning in patients with trauma-induced adult respiratory distress syndrome.

P Fridrich1, P Krafft, H Hochleuthner, W Mauritz.   

Abstract

Prone positioning improves gas exchange in some patients with adult respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), but the effects of repeated, long-term prone positioning (20 h duration) have never been evaluated systemically. We therefore investigated 20 patients with ARDS after multiple trauma (Injury Severity Score [ISS] 27.3 +/- 10, ARDS score 2.84 +/- 0.42). Patients who fulfilled the entry criteria (bilateral diffuse infiltrates, severe hypoxemia, pulmonary artery occlusion pressure [PAOP] < 18 mm Hg, and PaO2/fraction of inspired oxygen [FIO2] < 200 mm Hg at inverse ratio ventilation with positive end-expiratory pressure [PEEP] > 8 mm Hg for more than 24 h) were turned to the prone position at noon and were turned back to the supine position at 8:00 AM on the next day. Thus only two turns per day were necessary, and the risk of disconnecting airways or medical lines was minimized. Prone positioning was repeated for another 20 h if the patients fulfilled the entry criteria. Except for FIO2, the ventilator settings remained unchanged during the study period. All patients were sedated and, if needed paralyzed to minimize patient discomfort. One hour before and after each position change, ventilator settings and pulmonary and systemic hemodynamics were recorded and blood was obtained for blood gas analysis. Derived cardiopulmonary and ventilatory variables were calculated using standard formulas. Overall mortality was 10%. Oxygenation variables improved significantly each time the patients were placed prone. Immediately after the first turn from the supine to the prone position the following changes were observed: PaO2 increased from 97 +/- 4 to 152 +/- 15 mm Hg, intrapulmonary shunt (Qva/Qt) decreased from 30.3 +/- 2.3 to 25.5 +/- 1.8, and the alveolar-arterial oxygen difference decreased from 424 +/- 24 to 339 +/- 25 mm Hg. All these changes were statistically significant. Most of these improvements were lost when the patients were turned supine, but could be reproduced when prone positioning was repeated after a short period (4 h) in the supine position. Short periods in the supine position were necessary to allow for nursing care, medical evaluation, and interventions such as placement of central lines. No position-dependent changes of systemic hemodynamic variables were observed. We conclude that, in trauma patients with ARDS undergoing long-term positioning treatment, lung function improves significantly during prone position compared to short phases of conventional supine position during which the beneficial effects are partly lost.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8942587     DOI: 10.1097/00000539-199612000-00013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesth Analg        ISSN: 0003-2999            Impact factor:   5.108


  19 in total

1.  Two unusual complications of prone-dependency in severe ARDS.

Authors:  M C Willems; A J Voets; R J Welten
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  Advantages of the prone position for minimally invasive esophagectomy in comparison to the left decubitus position: better oxygenation after minimally invasive esophagectomy.

Authors:  Eiji Tanaka; Hiroshi Okabe; Yousuke Kinjo; Shigeru Tsunoda; Kazutaka Obama; Shigeo Hisamori; Yoshiharu Sakai
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2014-11-13       Impact factor: 2.549

Review 3.  Treatment of ARDS With Prone Positioning.

Authors:  Eric L Scholten; Jeremy R Beitler; G Kim Prisk; Atul Malhotra
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2016-07-08       Impact factor: 9.410

4.  Effect of prone positioning on clinical outcomes in children with acute lung injury: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Martha A Q Curley; Patricia L Hibberd; Lori D Fineman; David Wypij; Mei-Chiung Shih; John E Thompson; Mary Jo C Grant; Frederick E Barr; Natalie Z Cvijanovich; Lauren Sorce; Peter M Luckett; Michael A Matthay; John H Arnold
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2005-07-13       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Prone positioning can be safely performed in critically ill infants and children.

Authors:  Lori D Fineman; Michelle A LaBrecque; Mei-Chiung Shih; Martha A Q Curley
Journal:  Pediatr Crit Care Med       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 3.624

6.  Effects of ventilation in ventral decubitus position on respiratory mechanics in adult respiratory distress syndrome.

Authors:  G Servillo; E Roupie; E De Robertis; F Rossano; L Brochard; F Lemaire; R Tufano
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 17.440

7.  Acute effects of continuous rotational therapy on ventilation-perfusion inequality in lung injury.

Authors:  T Bein; A Reber; C Metz; K W Jauch; G Hedenstierna
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 17.440

8.  Protective effect of prone posture against hypergravity-induced arterial hypoxaemia in humans.

Authors:  M Rohdin; J Petersson; M Mure; R W Glenny; S G E Lindahl; D Linnarsson
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2003-02-21       Impact factor: 5.182

9.  [Comparison of incomplete (135 degrees ) and complete prone position (180 degrees ) in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome. Results of a prospective, randomised trial].

Authors:  T Bein; K Sabel; A Scherer; C Papp-Jambor; M Hekler; R Dubb; H J Schlitt; K Taeger
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 1.041

10.  Prognostic factors in acute respiratory distress syndrome: a retrospective multivariate analysis including prone positioning in management strategy.

Authors:  Christophe Venet; Stephane Guyomarc'h; Juliette Pingat; Christophe Michard; Silvy Laporte; Monique Bertrand; Pierre Gery; Dominique Page; Regine Vermesch; Jean Claude Bertrand; Fabrice Zeni
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2003-06-20       Impact factor: 17.440

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.